IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Gauging Liquidity Risk in Emerging Market Bond Index Funds

Listed author(s):
  • Serge Darolles
  • Jérémy Dudek
  • Gaëlle Le Fol

ETFs and index funds have grown at very rapid rates in recent years. Originally launched to track some large liquid indices in developed markets, they now also concern less liquid asset classes such as emerging market bonds. Illiquidity certainly affects the quality of the replication, and in particular, liquidity might increase the tracking error of any index fund, i.e., the difference between the fund and the benchmark returns. The tracking error is then the first characteristic that investors consider when they select index funds. In this paper, we begin from the CDS-bond basis to simulate the tracking error (TE) of a hypothetical well-diversified fund investing in the emerging market bond universe. We compute the CDS-bond basis and the tracking error for 9 emerging market sovereign entities: Brazil, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand and Turkey. All of these countries are included in the MSCI Emerging Market Debt in Local Currency index. Our sample period ranges from January 1, 2007 to March 26, 2012. Using a Regime Switching for Dynamic Correlations (RSDC) model, we show that the country-by-country tracking error is reduced by the diversification at the fund level. Moreover, we show that this diversification effect is less effective during crisis periods. This loss of diversification benefits is the main risk of index funds when they are designed to create a liquid exposure to illiquid asset classes.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by GENES in its journal Annals Of Economics and Statistics.

Volume (Year): (2016)
Issue (Month): 123-124 ()
Pages: 247-269

in new window

Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2016:i:123-124:p:247-269
DOI: 10.15609/annaeconstat2009.123-124.0247
Contact details of provider: Postal:
3, avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2016:i:123-124:p:247-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurent Linnemer)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.