Does it Pay to be a General Practitioner in France
The aim of this paper is to determine if the profession of GP is financially attractive in France. Using longitudinal data, we created two samples of 1,389 self-employed GPs and 4,825 salaried executives observed from 1980 to 2004. These two professions require high qualification levels, but the studies to become a GP are longer. To measure if GPs get returns that compensate for their investment in education, we analyze GPs.and executives.career profiles and construct a measure of individual wealth that takes into account all earnings from the age of 24, including years with no or low income for GPs before they set up their practice. Econometric analysis shows that after an initial period of patient recruitment, physicians experience a fatter career profile than executives. We also find that GP incomes for recent cohorts are favored by the low numerus clausus applied when they were in medical school. Stochastic dominance analysis shows that, for men, wealth distributions do not differ significantly between GPs and executives, but, for women, GP wealth distribution dominates executive wealth distribution at the first order. Hence, the relative return on medical studies is higher for women. While for men there is no monetary advantage or disadvantage in being a GP, for women, it is more profitable to be a GP than an executive. This can explain the large proportion of female GPs and the strong increase in the share of women among medical students.
Volume (Year): (2015)
Issue (Month): 119-120 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 3, avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex|
Web page: https://annals.ensae.fr/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2015:i:119-120:p:149-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurent Linnemer)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.