IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2000i59p1-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assurance complète, hétérogénéité des préférences et métayage au Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Dubois

Abstract

Most of the empirical tests reject the complete markets hypothesis, but have serious methodological problems concerning the identification of preferences, the direction of the tests and their power. We study the risk sharing and consumption insurance achieved by rural households from three provinces of Pakistan dealing with these methodological problems and taking into account that preferences are heterogeneous. At last, we show that in Pakistan, agricultural contracts play an important role in risk sharing when markets are incomplete since households able to use sharecropping contracts, which permits to share production risks, are better insured.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Dubois, 2000. "Assurance complète, hétérogénéité des préférences et métayage au Pakistan," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 59, pages 1-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2000:i:59:p:1-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076240
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Dubois & Bruno Jullien & Thierry Magnac, 2008. "Formal and Informal Risk Sharing in LDCs: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 679-725, July.
    2. Sarolta Laczo, 2010. "Estimating Dynamic Contracts: Risk Sharing in Village Economies," 2010 Meeting Papers 687, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2000:i:59:p:1-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.