IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/oajasm/v5y2020i2p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Motivations that Predict the Self-Selection and Choice of Blended Instructional Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Seredycz

    (Department of Sociology, MacEwan University, Canada)

Abstract

This case study examined 303 undergraduate students enrolled in seven traditional face to face courses who were offered the opportunity to self-select into one of four blended modes of instruction. Students could select face to face (F2F) intervals of 90% (almost exclusively in the classroom) to 70%, 30% and 10% (almost exclusively online with the exception of final exams). Findings suggest that students preferred a blended 70:30 face to face instructional delivery. Motivating factors including but not limited to the age of the learner, employment, flexibility and convenience, the number of courses a student is enrolled in, whether a course was an elective for their degree completion and commuting distance were all found to be significant factors in predicting a student’s self-selection of instructional delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Seredycz, 2020. "Student Motivations that Predict the Self-Selection and Choice of Blended Instructional Delivery," Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 5(2), pages 57-67, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:oajasm:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:57-67
    DOI: 10.19080/ASM.2020.05.555659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/asm/pdf/ASM.MS.ID.555659.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/asm/ASM.MS.ID.555659.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/ASM.2020.05.555659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    juniper publishers; social sciences journals; social anthropology; social policy; journal of social science; social and political science journals; journal of social science; open access; juniper publishers reivew;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:oajasm:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.