IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jomcij/v9y2019i1p12-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the Authors of Scientific Articles Protected Against Plagiarism? 27 Years of Experience Shows that Rather Plagiarists are Protected in the Peer Review System

Author

Listed:
  • à rpád Furka

    (Department of Organic Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

The Author of this article in 1990 submitted for publishing a manuscript describing the split-mix combinatorial synthesis and the invention was expropriated and published by the Editor in Chief of International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research and all the three reviewers are suspected to do so. The Author tried to seek justice but it was refused by the Editor in chief of Nature (where the expropriated invention was published), by the Office of Research Integrity at NIH and by the by the Munksgaard International Publishers, Copenhagen, publisher of the International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research. Since the plagiarists continued to publish misleading papers the Author sent 10 correction letters to the journals but only three were published. The Committee on Ethics of the American Chemical Society also refrained from acting. In order to avoid happening again of the mentioned type of plagiarism, introduction of new rules is suggested by the Author

Suggested Citation

  • à rpád Furka, 2019. "Are the Authors of Scientific Articles Protected Against Plagiarism? 27 Years of Experience Shows that Rather Plagiarists are Protected in the Peer Review System," Organic & Medicinal Chemistry International Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 9(1), pages 12-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:jomcij:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:12-17
    DOI: 10.19080/OMCIJ.2019.09.555753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/omcij/pdf/OMCIJ.MS.ID.555753.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/omcij/OMCIJ.MS.ID.555753.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/OMCIJ.2019.09.555753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jomcij:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:12-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.