IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/joajnn/v2y2017i5p101-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neurophysiological Study of Traumatic Brain Injury To Slice or Not to Slice

Author

Listed:
  • Jianli Sun

    (Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA)

  • Kimberle M Jacobs

    (Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA)

Abstract

Diffuse axotomy is characteristic of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) both clinically and in experimental models. Axotomy also occurs during preparation of acute brain slices for physiological recordings. Brain slices have been used for decades and have many advantages, including the ability to select cells within particular locations or with specific morphologies for study. The question addressed here is whether creating additional axotomy by preparing brain slices introduces additional injury that is already typical of TBI. We have previously demonstrated alterations in both intrinsic membrane and synaptic properties recorded in brain slices after mTBI. Here we examined whether axotomized neurons differ from intact neurons in slices made from naïve mouse pups. There was no significant difference in either excitatory synaptic postsynaptic currents or in any measures of intrinsic membrane and cellular properties. These results suggest that creating the brain slices does not induce alterations similar to that observed within two days of mTBI induced by fluid percussion injury. Thus ex vivo slices are an appropriate methodology to study the effects of TBI.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianli Sun & Kimberle M Jacobs, 2017. "Neurophysiological Study of Traumatic Brain Injury To Slice or Not to Slice," Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(5), pages 101-106, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:adp:joajnn:v:2:y:2017:i:5:p:101-106
    DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2017.02.555600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/pdf/OAJNN.MS.ID.555600.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/OAJNN.MS.ID.555600.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/OAJNN.2017.02.555600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:joajnn:v:2:y:2017:i:5:p:101-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.