Author
Listed:
- Gerald Chi
- Husnain Shaukat
- Mehrian Jafarizade
- Farima Kahe
- Arzu Kalayci
(Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, United States)
- Asrar Ahmad
(Department of Medicine, Abington Memorial Hospital, United States)
- Qasim Zulfiqar Malik
(Department of Medicine, Wright center for Graduate Medical Education, United States)
Abstract
Anisocytosis denotes the presence of unequal sizes of erythrocytes in the circulation and may signify the development of nutritional deficiency anemias, sickle cell anemia, hemolytic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and other hematological disorders. Red cell distribution width (RDW), a quantitative measure of the magnitude of anisocytosis, is routinely reported as a part of complete blood count by automated instruments in hematology laboratories. An elevated RDW is commonly used in the differential diagnoses of nutritional deficiency anemias and thalassemias. Rapidly accruing evidence indicates that RDW may offer prognostic information regarding the clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular scenarios. This article aims to review the current knowledge concerning the predictive value of RDW in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Elevated RDW is a strong predictor for mortality and major adverse cardiac events among patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. When incorporated into conventional risk assessment models, RDW also enhances the performance in predicting cardiovascular outcome. In light of its wide availability, low cost and common use, future research should consider RDW measurement in the risk stratification schemes for patients with coronary artery disease.
Suggested Citation
Gerald Chi & Husnain Shaukat & Mehrian Jafarizade & Farima Kahe & Arzu Kalayci & Asrar Ahmad & Qasim Zulfiqar Malik, 2018.
"Prognostic Value of Red Cell Distribution Width in Acute Coronary Syndrome,"
Open Access Blood Research & Transfusion Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(4), pages 86-92, January.
Handle:
RePEc:adp:joabtj:v:1:y:2018:i:4:p:86-92
DOI: 10.19080/OABTJ.2018.01.555570
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:joabtj:v:1:y:2018:i:4:p:86-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.