IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jgjpps/v6y2018i3p61-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antibiotic use Profiles and Microbial Patterns in the Surgery Department of Bangil Regional General Hospital, Pasuruan

Author

Listed:
  • Fauna Herawati
  • Beatrix Eyleen Giovanny
  • Rika Yulia

    (Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya, Surabaya)

  • Abdul Kadir Jaelani

    (Regional General Hospital Bangil, Jl. Raya Raci - Bangil,Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the profile of the use of antibiotics in units of DDD / 100 patient-days, types of bacteria as well as the sensitivity of bacteria in the Surgery Department of Bangil Regional General Hospital, Pasuruan during the period from January to June 2016. The study was conducted using a descriptive, cross-sectional study design and data collection was done retrospectively. Nineteen percent patients in the surgical ward was given antibiotic. The results showed that the 3 most-used antibiotics are ciprofloxacin (11.8 DDD / 100 patient-days), ceftazidime (6.7 DDD / 100 patient-days), and cefixime (4.3 DDD / 100 patient-days). Ciprofloxacin became the most widely used antibiotics with DU of 26% from the total antibiotic. Within six months, there are four bacteria identified from the culture test result, i.e.: Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter sp. Only vancomycin is an antibiotic which has 100% sensitivity to S. aureus. The DDD / 100 patient-days for 19% patients is 45.83, this result shows that the trend of using antibiotic is more than one DDD antibiotic per day.

Suggested Citation

  • Fauna Herawati & Beatrix Eyleen Giovanny & Rika Yulia & Abdul Kadir Jaelani, 2018. "Antibiotic use Profiles and Microbial Patterns in the Surgery Department of Bangil Regional General Hospital, Pasuruan," Global Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(3), pages 61-66, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:jgjpps:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:61-66
    DOI: 10.19080/GJPPS.2018.06.555689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjpps/pdf/GJPPS.MS.ID.555689.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjpps/GJPPS.MS.ID.555689.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/GJPPS.2018.06.555689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jgjpps:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:61-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.