IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v1y2012i11p62-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediation Analysis via Observation Oriented Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Erika A. Brown
  • James W. Grice

Abstract

Psychologists routinely treat psychological attributes as quantitative in nature, and the majority of statistical tools traditionally employed by psychologists also rest upon the assumption of continuous quantitative structure. There is no evidence, however, that attributes such as intelligence, depression, personality traits, etc. are truly quantitative, thus rendering most statistical techniques inappropriate for psychological data. Observation Oriented Modeling (OOM) is an alternative data analysis technique that does not require the assumption of continuous quantity, and it is an approach that eschews aggregate statistics while returning individual observations to the forefront of the analysis. Two published mediation models are re-analyzed in the current paper using OOM and the results compared to those obtained from traditional, variable-based analyses. It is shown that OOM yields results that are entirely transparent and readily interpretable. Unlike traditional analyses, the results also provide a clear understanding of what is happening at the level of the persons in the two studies. OOM is therefore a novel way of conceptualizing and analyzing data that may lead to more accurate and complete explanations of psychological phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika A. Brown & James W. Grice, 2012. "Mediation Analysis via Observation Oriented Modeling," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 1(11), pages 62-80, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:11:p:62-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/79
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V1-201211-011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erika A. Brown & James W. Grice, 2011. "One is Enough," SAGE Open, , vol. 1(3), pages 21582440114, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cătălina Oțoiu & Lucia Rațiu & Claudia Lenuța Rus, 2019. "Rivals When We Work Together: Team Rivalry Effects on Performance in Collaborative Learning Groups," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:11:p:62-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.