IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/yid504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiation in higher education: the main concepts and approaches to study

Author

Listed:
  • E. A. Knyazev
  • N. V. Drantusova

Abstract

In the article there are given different approaches to institutional diversity and differentiation analysis realized by foreign and Russian experts. B. Clark’s triangle of coordination and the stakeholders’ theory are proposed as a methodology for the analysis of emerging higher education landscape in Russia. The authors concluded that the state as a main stakeholder of higher education should have a wide range of priorities of the educational policy and more flexible instruments to encourage the differentiation and diversity in Russian higher education system.

Suggested Citation

  • E. A. Knyazev & N. V. Drantusova, 0. "Differentiation in higher education: the main concepts and approaches to study," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, issue 5.
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/504/505
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitry Savkin & Elena Loktionova & Daria Khlebovich, 2020. "Greenfield Projects in the Higher Education Ecosystem: The Case of Baikal School of BRICS," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 113-140.
    2. Савкин Д. А. & Локтионова Е. А. & Хлебович Д. И., 2020. "Гринфилд В Экосистеме Высшего Образования: Кейс Байкальского Института Брикс," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 113-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.