IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abf/journl/v48y2023i1p39167-39179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Difference Between a Bicruciate-Stabilising Knee and a Cruciate-Retaining Knee Regards Functional Outcomes Over the Body Mass Index Range

Author

Listed:
  • Shreya Seth

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • Alasdair JA Santini

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
    Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK)

  • Matt Gornall

    (Liverpool Cancer Trials Centre, The University of Liverpool, UK)

  • Andrew Phillipson

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • John S Davidson

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • Joanne V Banks

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • Jill A Pope

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • Joanne Yorke

    (Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

Abstract

Obesity is major world-wide health issue; simultaneously, there is an increase in knee arthroplasty. Some heath authorities withhold surgery to morbidly obese groups, citing poorer outcomes and higher levels of complications. Current literature analyses outcomes and complications, but there is a paucity of data in outcomes of obese patients, dependent on implant type.

Suggested Citation

  • Shreya Seth & Alasdair JA Santini & Matt Gornall & Andrew Phillipson & John S Davidson & Joanne V Banks & Jill A Pope & Joanne Yorke, 2023. "No Difference Between a Bicruciate-Stabilising Knee and a Cruciate-Retaining Knee Regards Functional Outcomes Over the Body Mass Index Range," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 48(1), pages 39167-39179, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:48:y:2023:i:1:p:39167-39179
    DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2023.48.007603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.007603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.007603.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26717/BJSTR.2023.48.007603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:48:y:2023:i:1:p:39167-39179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Roy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.