IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abf/journl/v1y2017i2p536-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Quality of Perineal Auscultation for A Noninvasive Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Author

Listed:
  • Geert Geleijnse
  • Jan Groen
  • Ron van Mastrigt

    (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam)

  • Tim Idzenga

    (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
    Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam)

Abstract

The current standard method for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) is a pressure-flow study. Electronic perineal auscultation, i.e. recording sound with a contact microphone behind the scrotum during voiding, might be an easy-to-use non-invasive alternative...

Suggested Citation

  • Geert Geleijnse & Jan Groen & Ron van Mastrigt & Tim Idzenga, 2017. "Assessing the Quality of Perineal Auscultation for A Noninvasive Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Outlet Obstruction," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 1(2), pages 536-540, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:536-540
    DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.000239.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.000239.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Biomedical Sciences; Biomedical Research; Technical Research; Bladder outlet obstruction; Noninvasive; Normalized cross correlation; Perineal auscultation; Quality measure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:536-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Roy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.