IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v30y2026i1p222-260.html

Technological Capabilities and Institutional Pressures in Green Logistics Adoption: Evidence from an Emerging Economy's Freight Forwarding Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Erkan Duzgun

    (School of Business, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Tuyen Thi Hoang Nguyen

    (School of Business, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examines how access to green technologies, institutional pressures, and supply chain collaboration influence green logistics adoption and organizational performance in Vietnam's logistics industry. Motivated by inconsistent findings in prior sustainability research and concerns about model validity in emerging-market studies, the paper integrates the Resource-Based View and Institutional Theory to explain how internal capabilities and external constraints jointly shape sustainability outcomes. [Design/methodology/approach] Data were collected through a structured questionnaire survey, yielding 334 valid responses from logistics firms operating in Vietnam. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS was employed to test direct, moderating, and mediating relationships, supported by bootstrapping. To enhance robustness and address spurious inference concerns, extensive diagnostic tests were conducted, and key results were cross-validated using covariance-based SEM (CB-SEM). [Findings] The results indicate that access to green technologies has a limited direct effect on green logistics adoption, whereas supply chain collaboration significantly enhances adoption and environmental awareness. Institutional pressures primarily influence organizational performance rather than operational adoption decisions. Moderation and mediation analyses show that organizational size and environmental awareness condition and partially transmit the effects of technological access and collaboration. By clarifying how organizational and institutional factors shape sustainability adoption under uncertainty, these findings provide evidence-based insights that support managerial and policy decision-making in Decision Sciences. [Theoretical implications] The study challenges technology-centric explanations of green logistics adoption by demonstrating that organizational and institutional mechanisms play a more decisive role in emerging markets, thereby extending sustainability and logistics theory through a combined moderation–mediation framework. [Practical implications] Logistics firms should complement green technology investments with organizational capability development and supply chain collaboration. Policymakers should strengthen institutional frameworks and support collaborative sustainability initiatives, particularly for small and medium-sized firms. [Originality/value] This study is among the first to integrate extended survey data, dual SEM estimation, comprehensive diagnostics, and moderation–mediation analysis to examine green logistics adoption in an emerging economy, offering robust empirical and methodological contributions to sustainability and decision sciences research.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkan Duzgun & Tuyen Thi Hoang Nguyen, 2026. "Technological Capabilities and Institutional Pressures in Green Logistics Adoption: Evidence from an Emerging Economy's Freight Forwarding Sector," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 30(1), pages 222-260, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:222-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/technological-capabilities-and-institutional-pressures-in-green-logistics-adoption-evidence-from-an-emerging-economys-freight-forwarding-sector/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://iads.site/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Technological-Capabilities-and-Institutional-Pressures-in-Green-Logistics-Adoption-Evidence-from-an-Emerging-Economys-Freight-Forwarding-Sector.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:222-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.