IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/spr/psycho/v29y1964i2p177-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Notes on factorial invariance

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
  2. Richard Harshman & Margaret Lundy, 1996. "Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of Tucker's three-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/candecomp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 133-154, March.
  3. John McArdle, 2011. "Longitudinal dynamic analyses of cognition in the health and retirement study panel," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 453-480, December.
  4. Wilson, Christopher J. & Bowden, Stephen C. & Byrne, Linda K. & Joshua, Nicole R. & Marx, Wolfgang & Weiss, Lawrence G., 2023. "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  5. Pitts, Steven C. & West, Stephen G. & Tein, Jenn-Yun, 1996. "Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 333-350, November.
  6. Roger Millsap, 2007. "Invariance in Measurement and Prediction Revisited," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 461-473, December.
  7. Bengt Muthen & Karl G. Jöreskog, 1983. "Selectivity Problems in Quasi-Experimental Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 139-174, April.
  8. Piia Seppälä & Saija Mauno & Taru Feldt & Jari Hakanen & Ulla Kinnunen & Asko Tolvanen & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2009. "The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 459-481, August.
  9. K. Jöreskog, 1971. "Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 409-426, December.
  10. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
  11. Francisco J. García Bacete & Victoria Muñoz Tinoco & Ghislaine Marande Perrin & Jesús F. Rosel Remírez, 2021. "Stability of Peer Acceptance and Rejection and Their Effect on Academic Performance in Primary Education: A Longitudinal Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
  12. Bruce Bloxom, 1968. "Factorial rotation to simple structure and maximum similarity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(2), pages 237-247, June.
  13. P. Bentler, 1986. "Structural modeling and psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 35-51, March.
  14. Michael Browne & Walter Kristof, 1969. "On the oblique rotation of a factor matrix to a specified pattern," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 237-248, June.
  15. Bengt Muthén, 1989. "Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 557-585, September.
  16. Adam Carle, 2010. "Interpreting the results of studies using latent variable models to assess data quality: an empirical example using confirmatory factor analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 483-497, April.
  17. Cernat, Alexandru, 2015. "Using equivalence testing to disentangle selection and measurement in mixed modes surveys," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-01, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  18. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
  19. Scholderer, Joachim & Grunert, Klaus G. & Brunso, Karen, 2005. "A procedure for eliminating additive bias from cross-cultural survey data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-78, January.
  20. Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2023. "Ignoring Non-ignorable Missingness," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 31-50, March.
  21. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.
  22. Bruce Bloxom, 1968. "A note on invariance in three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(3), pages 347-350, September.
  23. Joseph Levin, 1966. "Simultaneous factor analysis of several Gramian matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(3), pages 413-419, September.
  24. Bruce Bloxom, 1972. "Alternative approaches to factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 425-440, December.
  25. Dave Grayson, 2006. "Might “unique” factors be “common”? On the possibility of indeterminate common–unique covariances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 521-528, September.
  26. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
  27. Hao Wu & Ryne Estabrook, 2016. "Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1014-1045, December.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.