IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/ecm/emetrp/v51y1983i1p225-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Sufficient Conditions for the Consistency of Maximum Likelihood Estimation Despite Misspecifications of Distribution in Multinomial Discrete Choice Models

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Magnac, Thierry & Maurin, Eric, 2007. "Identification and information in monotone binary models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 76-104, July.
  2. Maximilian Riedl & Ingo Geishecker, 2014. "Keep it simple: estimation strategies for ordered response models with fixed effects," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2358-2374, November.
  3. Erik Bergkvist & Per Johansson, 2000. "Weighted Derivative Estimation of Quantal Response Models: Simulations and Applications to Choice of Truck Freight Carrier," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 485-510, December.
  4. Geishecker, Ingo & Riedl, Maximilian, 2012. "Ordered response models and non-random personality traits: Monte Carlo simulations and a practical guide," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 116, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
  5. Lee, Lung-fei & Rosenzweig, Mark R. & Pitt, Mark M., 1997. "The effects of improved nutrition, sanitation, and water quality on child health in high-mortality populations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 209-235, March.
  6. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
  7. Gopalakrishnan, Raja & Guevara, C. Angelo & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Combining multiple imputation and control function methods to deal with missing data and endogeneity in discrete-choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 45-57.
  8. Peeters, H.M.M., 1989. "Het gebruik van een parametrische en een semi-parametrische schattingsmethode voor het binaire keuzemodel: Probit Maximum Likelihood versus Maximum Score [The use of a parametric and a semi-paramet," MPRA Paper 28104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  9. Bednarski, Tadeusz & Skolimowska-Kulig, Magdalena, 2019. "On scale Fisher consistency of maximum likelihood estimator for the exponential regression model under arbitrary frailty," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-12.
  10. Newey, Whitney K., 1999. "Consistency of two-step sample selection estimators despite misspecification of distribution," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 129-132, May.
  11. Erik Bergkvist, 2001. "The value of time and forecasting of flowsin freight transportation," ERSA conference papers ersa01p271, European Regional Science Association.
  12. Zhao, Zhong, 2008. "Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 309-319, March.
  13. Yan, Jin & Yoo, Hong Il, 2019. "Semiparametric estimation of the random utility model with rank-ordered choice data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 414-438.
  14. Joshua Lospinoso & Michael Schweinberger & Tom Snijders & Ruth Ripley, 2011. "Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(2), pages 147-176, July.
  15. Xu, Ruonan, 2021. "On the instrument functional form with a binary endogenous explanatory variable," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  16. Malmendier, Ulrike M. & Botsch, Matthew J., 2020. "The Long Shadows of the Great Inflation: Evidence from Residential Mortgages," CEPR Discussion Papers 14934, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  17. Fourgeaud Claude & Gourieroux Christian & Pradel Jacqueline, 1988. "Hétérogénéité dans les modèles à représentation linéaire," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 8805, CEPREMAP.
  18. Shakeeb Khan & Xiaoying Lan & Elie Tamer & Qingsong Yao, 2021. "Estimating High Dimensional Monotone Index Models by Iterative Convex Optimization1," Papers 2110.04388, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
  19. Guevara, C. Angelo, 2018. "Overidentification tests for the exogeneity of instruments in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 241-253.
  20. Guevara, C. Angelo, 2015. "Critical assessment of five methods to correct for endogeneity in discrete-choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 240-254.
  21. Thierry Magnac & Eric Maurin, 2003. "Identification et Information in Monotone Binary Models," Working Papers 2003-07, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  22. Alan P. Ker & Abdoul G. Sam, 2018. "Semiparametric estimation of the link function in binary-choice single-index models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1429-1455, September.
  23. Ana Fernandez & Juan Rodriquez-Poo, 1997. "Estimation and specification testing in female labor participation models: parametric and semiparametric methods," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 229-247.
  24. Coppejans, Mark, 2001. "Estimation of the binary response model using a mixture of distributions estimator (MOD)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 231-269, June.
  25. Kaicheng Chen & Robert S. Martin & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2023. "Another Look at the Linear Probability Model and Nonlinear Index Models," Papers 2308.15338, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
  26. Eleni (E.) Aristodemou, 2018. "Semiparametric Identification in Panel Data Discrete Response Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-065/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  27. J.S. Cramer, 2005. "Omitted Variables and Misspecified Disturbances in the Logit Model," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-084/4, Tinbergen Institute.
  28. Hanemann, W. Michael & Kanninen, Barbara, 1996. "The Statistical Analysis Of Discrete-Response Cv Data," CUDARE Working Papers 25022, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  29. Meyer, Bruce D. & Mittag, Nikolas, 2017. "Misclassification in binary choice models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 295-311.
  30. Lewbel, Arthur, 2000. "Semiparametric qualitative response model estimation with unknown heteroscedasticity or instrumental variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 145-177, July.
  31. Cristian Angelo Guevara & Moshe E. Ben-Akiva, 2012. "Change of Scale and Forecasting with the Control-Function Method in Logit Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 425-437, August.
  32. Sonia Laszlo & Eric Santor, 2004. "Internal Migration and Borrowing Constraints: Evidence from Peru," Development and Comp Systems 0411022, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  33. Rossetti, Tomás & Guevara, C. Angelo & Galilea, Patricia & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2018. "Modeling safety as a perceptual latent variable to assess cycling infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 252-265.
  34. Takahiro ITO, 2023. "Resampling-Based Maximum Likelihood Estimation," GSICS Working Paper Series 40, Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, Kobe University.
  35. Zonghui Hu & Dean A. Follmann & Jing Qin, 2012. "Semiparametric Double Balancing Score Estimation for Incomplete Data With Ignorable Missingness," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 247-257, March.
  36. Guevara, C. Angelo & Hess, Stephane, 2019. "A control-function approach to correct for endogeneity in discrete choice models estimated on SP-off-RP data and contrasts with an earlier FIML approach by Train & Wilson," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 224-239.
  37. M. Genius & E. Strazzera, 2005. "Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach," Working Paper CRENoS 200502, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
  38. Bruce Meyer & Nikolas Mittag, 2013. "Misclassification In Binary Choice Models," Working Papers 13-27, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  39. Guggisberg Michael, 2019. "Misspecified Discrete Choice Models and Huber-White Standard Errors," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
  40. Insan Tunali & Berk Yavuzoglu, 2018. "Edgeworth Expansion Based Correction Of Selectivity Bias In Models Of Double Selection," Working Papers 1802, Nazarbayev University, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2018.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.