IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/aea/aecrev/v68y1978i4p561-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Vertical Integration: The Monopsony Case

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Loertscher, Simon & Reisinger, Markus, 2009. "Competitive E?ects of Vertical Integration with Downstream Oligopsony and Oligopoly," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 278, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
  2. Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer & Thibaud Vergé, 2021. "Double Marginalization and Vertical Integration," CESifo Working Paper Series 8971, CESifo.
  3. Kolesnik, Georgiy, 2011. "Перекрестные Права Собственности И Их Влияние На Эффективность Вертикальной Интеграции Предприятий [Cross-ownership and its influence on vertical integration efficiency of enterprises]," MPRA Paper 57474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  4. Hamilton, Stephen F & Stiegert, Kyle, 2000. "Vertical Coordination, Antitrust Law, and International Trade," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 143-156, April.
  5. Jain, Amit, 2011. "Connaissance, ressources, concurrence et les frontières de l'entreprise," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/6403 edited by Thiétart, Raymond-Alain.
  6. Francine Lafontaine & Margaret Slade, 2007. "Vertical Integration and Firm Boundaries: The Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 629-685, September.
  7. Bruno Larue & Olivier Bonroy, 2009. "Seemingly Competitive Food Retail Regulations: Who Do They Really Help?," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(3), pages 305-324, September.
  8. Mare Sarr & Tim Swanson, 2011. "Intellectual Property and Biodiversity: When and Where are Property Rights Important?," Working Papers 2011.79, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  9. Simon Loertscher & Markus Reisinger, 2014. "Market structure and the competitive effects of vertical integration," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(3), pages 471-494, September.
  10. Zhang, Mingxia & Sexton, Richard J., 2000. "Captive Supplies And The Cash Market Price: A Spatial Markets Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-21, July.
  11. Fronmueller, M. P. & Reed, R., 1996. "The competitive advantage potential of vertical integration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 715-726, December.
  12. Ernesto R Fontaine & Salvador Valdés, "undated". "Libre Competencia y Autorización a Concesionarios Locales para Operar en Larga Distancia," Documentos de Trabajo 127, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
  13. Simon Loertscher & Leslie Marx, 2014. "An Oligopoly Model for Analyzing and Evaluating (Re)-Assignments of Spectrum Licenses," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 45(3), pages 245-273, November.
  14. Robert Z. Lawrence, 1991. "How Open is Japan?," NBER Chapters, in: Trade with Japan: Has the Door Opened Wider?, pages 9-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  15. Brianna L. Alderman & Roger D. Blair, 2023. "Vertical integration to avoid monopsonistic exploitation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1824-1832, June.
  16. Mokhtar Kouki & Sang Park & Eric Renault, 2014. "Estimating scale economies in financial intermediation: a doubly indirect inference," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 351-365, June.
  17. Pritchett, James G. & Liu, Donald J., 1998. "Estimating Backward Integration In A Primary Input Market: The Case Of U.S. Hog Industry," Conference Papers 14480, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
  18. Jarrad Harford & Robert Schonlau & Jared Stanfield, 2019. "Trade Relationships, Indirect Economic Links, and Mergers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3085-3110, July.
  19. Matthey, Holger & Royer, Jeffrey S., 1998. "Backward Integration By Cooperatives In Imperfectly Competitive Agricultural Raw Product Markets," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 21014, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  20. de Fontenay, Catherine C. & Gans, Joshua S., 2004. "Can vertical integration by a monopsonist harm consumer welfare?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 821-834, June.
  21. Love, H. Alan & Burton, Diana M., 1997. "A Rationale For Captive Supplies," Strategy and Policy in the Food System: Emerging Issues, June 20-21, 1996, Washington, D.C. 25948, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
  22. Antelo, Manel & Bru, Lluís, 2009. "Permit markets, market power, and the trade-off between efficiency and revenue raising," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 320-333, November.
  23. Merel, Pierre R., 2007. "Efficiency and Redistribution in the French Comte Cheese Market," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9396, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  24. Margaret E. Slade, 1998. "The Leverage Theory of Tying Revisited: Evidence from Newspaper Advertising," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(2), pages 204-222, October.
  25. Mussell, Al & Martin, Larry J., 2002. "Firm-Level Forces Underlying Concentration In Agriculture," Miscellaneous Publications 18095, George Morris Center.
  26. Pritchett, James G. & Liu, Donald J., 1999. "Modeling Price Impacts Of Backward Vertical Integration In The Us Pork Industry," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21594, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.