IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20131.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze aus gegebenem Anlass

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Die ordonomische Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft liefert eine Diagnose und Therapie für folgende Misere: Zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen betreiben eine Kampagne gegen die Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen. Sie erheben den Vorwurf, bestimmte Terminmarktgeschäfte würden weltweit Hunger verursachen. Gemessen am Erkenntnisstand der wissenschaftlichen Literatur, entbehrt dieser Vorwurf einer sachlichen Rechtfertigung. Mit dieser Kampagne leisten die zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen dem moralischen Anliegen einer wirksamen Bekämpfung des globalen Hungers einen Bärendienst. Zugleich gefährden sie sich selbst: Auf Dauer können sie ja nur erfolgreich sein, wenn ihre Glaubwürdigkeit über jeden Zweifel erhaben ist. In dieser Hinsicht ist Vertrauen verloren gegangen. Deshalb kommt nun viel darauf an, wie die zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen auf die wissenschaftliche Kritik an ihrer Kampagne reagieren und was genau sie unternehmen, um ihren guten Ruf wiederherzustellen. Vorschläge hierzu liegen auf dem Tisch.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze aus gegebenem Anlass," Discussion Papers 2013-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170387/1/dp2013-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2009. "Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 375-401, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Agrarspekulation: Replik auf Thilo Bode," Discussion Papers 2013-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2014. "Miteinander oder Gegeneinander? Zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Unternehmen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2014-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ethik der Agrarspekulation: Rückblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2013-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Interview zur Moral der Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen und zur Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2014-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Laudatio Max-Weber-Preis 2014 in der Kategorie Ausbildungs-Studienpreis," Discussion Papers 2014-19, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Pies, Ingo & Glauben, Thomas, 2013. "Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zum Argumentationspapier von Foodwatch," Discussion Papers 2013-26, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg, 2013. "Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Analyse und Bewertung aus wirtschaftsethischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2013-24, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Der ordonomische Ansatz: Eine Illustration am Beispiel des Mindestlohns," Discussion Papers 2014-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Brauchen wir NGOs?," Discussion Papers 2017-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2013-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    3. Will, Matthias Georg & Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Discourse and regulation failures: The ambivalent influence of NGOs on political organizations," Discussion Papers 2014-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Wockenfuß, Christof, 2009. "Demokratie durch Entwicklungskonkurrenz," Discussion Papers 2009-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Lisa Herzog, 2017. "No Company is an Island. Sector-Related Responsibilities as Elements of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 135-148, November.
    6. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2009. "Sozialstruktur und Semantik - Ordonomik als Forschungsprogramm in der modernen (Welt-)Gesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2009-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Stefan Hielscher & Matthias Georg Will, 2014. "Mental Models of Sustainability: Unearthing and Analyzing the Mental Images of Corporate Sustainability with Qualitative Empirical Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 708-719, November.
    8. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2015. "From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 143-155.
    9. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    11. Hielscher, Stefan, 2015. "Ehre und Vertrauen im Fernhandel der Deutschen Hanse: Ein Beitrag zur Debatte um das Ideal des "Ehrbaren Kaufmanns" aus Sicht der Ordonomik," Discussion Papers 2015-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    12. Lucke Eva Maria & Lütge Christoph, 2011. "Moralisches Verhalten in einem korrupten Markt: Anreize und Erfolgsfaktoren anhand einer Fallstudie aus Argentinien / Moral behaviour in a corrupted market: Incentives and success factors – a case stu," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 297-320, January.
    13. Matthias Georg Will & Stefan Hielscher, 2014. "How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Suchanek Andreas, 2012. "Unternehmensverantwortung als Vermeidung relevanter Inkonsistenzen / Corporate Responsibility: The Avoidance of Relevant Inconsistencies," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 241-260, January.
    15. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus, 2009. "Whistle-Blowing heißt nicht: "verpfeifen" - Ordonomische Überlegungen zur Korruptionsprävention durch und in Unternehmen," Discussion Papers 2009-19, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Vladislav Valentinov, 2014. "The Complexity–Sustainability Trade‐Off in Niklas Luhmann's Social Systems Theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 14-22, January.
    18. Vladislav Valentinov & Lioudmila Chatalova, 2016. "Institutional Economics, Social Dilemmas, and the Complexity-Sustainability Trade-off (A response to Hielscher and Pies)," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 488-491, May.
    19. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2012-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    20. Stefan Hielscher & Bryan W. Husted, 2020. "Proto-CSR Before the Industrial Revolution: Institutional Experimentation by Medieval Miners’ Guilds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 253-269, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.