IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kasvdb/83.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kontraktion & Konvergenz: Probleme der nachhaltigkeitsökonomischen Generalisierung eines klimapolitischen Zukunftsmodells

Author

Listed:
  • Henrich, Károly

Abstract

Contraction & Convergence' (C&C) is a model for the future. It is based upon the view, supported by indicators such as the 'ecological footprint', that human levels of natural resource consumption already overstep the ecological capacity of the Earth System by about 20% and must urgently be limited, at least to the level of this global eco-capacity. This process of contraction will only be politically acceptable and enforceable worldwide if it is linked to the equity aspect, the major disparities in natural resource consumption being removed through a process of convergence accompanying that of contraction. However, until now expansion and divergence have characterized human use of nature throughout history: Humankind has increasingly expanded those parts of the ecosphere dominated, disrupted and destroyed by it. At the same time, levels of natural resource consumption have increasingly diverged within and among human societies. The counter-model - Contraction & Convergence - was initially developed for climate policy and future greenhouse gas emissions. The Wuppertal Institute has attempted to widen this into a general environmental policy model for the future in its Fair Future study, but did not conduct any precise quantification. Lovink, Wackernagel & Goldfinger have produced quantitatively more precise scenarios. They range from reducing natural resource consumption to 88% of global ecological capacity following the Brundtland Report, to a contraction to 50% as proposed by the biologist Wilson. Numerous difficulties stand in the way of realizing such concepts - for the price of their implementation would be severe reductions in the volume of output and stock of capital of economies and/or in the world population. Not least, both the prevailing socio-economic power structures and the fact, founded in evolutionary biology, that we are 'unfit for sustainability' and for deference to nature stand in the way of realizing C&C models.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrich, Károly, 2006. "Kontraktion & Konvergenz: Probleme der nachhaltigkeitsökonomischen Generalisierung eines klimapolitischen Zukunftsmodells," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 83, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kasvdb:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/32140/1/511359586.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinhold Kosfeld & Jorgen Lauridsen, 2009. "Dynamic spatial modelling of regional convergence processes," Studies in Empirical Economics, in: Giuseppe Arbia & Badi H. Baltagi (ed.), Spatial Econometrics, pages 245-261, Springer.
    2. Bannier, Christina E., 2005. "Big elephants in small ponds: Do large traders make financial markets more aggressive?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 1517-1531, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michaelis, Jochen, 2007. "Internationaler Handel," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 91, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    2. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich & Kosfeld, Reinhold & Türck, Matthias, 2007. "Anmerkung zur Identifikation von Förderregionen in der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 90, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    3. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich & Kosfeld, Reinhold & Türck, Matthias, 2006. "Abgrenzung deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 81, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    4. Bernd Aumann & Rolf Scheufele, 2010. "Is East Germany catching up? A time series perspective," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 177-192.
    5. Hans-Friedrich Eckey & Reinhold Kosfeld & Matthias Türck, 2007. "Regionale Entwicklung mit und ohne räumliche Spillover-Effekte," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 27(1), pages 23-42, February.
    6. Christina Bannier, 2007. "Heterogeneous multiple bank financing: does it reduce inefficient credit-renegotiation incidences?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 21(4), pages 445-470, December.
    7. Lauridsen, J. & Kosfeld, R., 2004. "A wald Test for Spatial Nonstationarity," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 1-12, Diciembre.
    8. Falko Juessen, 2009. "A distribution dynamics approach to regional GDP convergence in unified Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 627-652, December.
    9. Benos, Nikos & Karagiannis, Stelios, 2013. "Do Cross-Section Dependence and Parameter Heterogeneity Matter? Evidence on Human Capital and Productivity in Greece," MPRA Paper 53326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Cheung, Yin-Wong & Friedman, Daniel, 2009. "Speculative attacks: A laboratory study in continuous time," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1064-1082, October.
    11. Taketa, Kenshi & Suzuki-Löffelholz, Kumi & Arikawa, Yasuhiro, 2009. "Experimental analysis on the role of a large speculator in currency crises," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 602-617, October.
    12. Michaelis, Jochen, 2005. "Zur Reform der Leistungsformen der Pflegeversicherung: Ein familienökonomischer Ansatz," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 74, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    13. Christian Bauer & Bernhard Herz, 2009. "The Dynamics of Financial Crises and the Risk to Defend the Exchange Rate," Research Papers in Economics 2009-03, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    14. Thomas Doring & Jan Schnellenbach, 2006. "What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 375-395.
    15. Vicente German-Soto & Gregory Brock, 2022. "Overall US and Census Region β-Convergence 1963–2015 Controlling for Spatial Effects," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 64(1), pages 44-67, March.
    16. Aitor Erce, 2012. "Does the IMF´s official support affect sovereign bond maturities?," Working Papers 1231, Banco de España.
    17. Hans-Friedrich Eckey & Reinhold Kosfeld & Matthias Türck, 2007. "Regional Convergence in Germany: a Geographically Weighted Regression Approach," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 45-64.
    18. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich & Kosfeld, Reinhold & Türck, Matthias, 2004. "Regionale Produktionsfunktionen mit Spillover-Effekten für Deutschland," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 64, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    19. Schmidt, André, 2007. "Per-se-Rule, Rule of Reason und der "more economic approach"," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 92, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    20. Andrea Vaona, 2010. "Spatial autocorrelation and the sensitivity of RESET: a simulation study," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 89-103, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kasvdb:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekasde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.