IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifmmat/283.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der gesellschaftliche Beitrag des Mittelstands: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen
[The societal impact of German Mittelstand: Conceptual considerations]

Author

Listed:
  • Welter, Friederike
  • Schlepphorst, Susanne
  • Schneck, Stefan
  • Holz, Michael

Abstract

Die vorliegende Studie setzt sich konzeptionell mit dem gesellschaftlichen Beitrag des Mittelstands auseinander. Ziel ist es, die gesellschaftliche Rolle des Mittelstands über betrieblich messbare Effekte (CSR, CC) hinaus zu betrachten und eine Grundlage für nachfolgende empirische Untersuchungen zu erarbeiten. Der gesellschaftliche Beitrag ist als Zusatznutzen der wirtschaftlichen Tätigkeit zu verstehen. Dabei bilden gesellschaftliche Erwartungen und politische Zielsetzungen den Rahmen für den gesellschaftlichen Mehrwert von Unternehmen. Dem Mittelstand kommt aufgrund seiner spezifischen Governance-Struktur, Zielsetzungen, der regionalen Einbettung und seines Verhaltens in Krisenzeiten eine besondere Rolle zu.

Suggested Citation

  • Welter, Friederike & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Schneck, Stefan & Holz, Michael, 2020. "Der gesellschaftliche Beitrag des Mittelstands: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen [The societal impact of German Mittelstand: Conceptual considerations]," IfM-Materialien 283, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224781/1/1733458689.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pahnke, André & Holz, Michael & Welter, Friederike, 2019. "Unternehmerische Zielsysteme: Unterscheiden sich mittelständische Unternehmen tatsächlich von anderen?," IfM-Materialien 276, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    2. Zoltan J. Acs & Ronnie J. Phillips, 2008. "Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy in American Capitalism," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 34, pages 509-524, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Michael Berlemann & Vera Jahn, 2016. "Regional Importance of Mittelstand Firms and Innovation Performance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(11), pages 1819-1833, November.
    4. André Pahnke & Friederike Welter, 2019. "The German Mittelstand: antithesis to Silicon Valley entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 345-358, February.
    5. Block, J.H. & Spiegel, F., 2013. "Family firm density and regional innovation output: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 270-280.
    6. Ross Williams, 2013. "Introduction," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(4), pages 460-461, December.
    7. Shaker A. Zahra & Mike Wright, 2016. "Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 610-629, June.
    8. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Günterberg, Brigitte, 2014. "Mittelstand im Wandel," IfM-Materialien 232, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    9. Rachel Doern & Nick Williams & Tim Vorley, 2019. "Special issue on entrepreneurship and crises: business as usual? An introduction and review of the literature," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5-6), pages 400-412, May.
    10. Bird, Miriam & Wennberg, Karl, 2014. "Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 421-436.
    11. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Holz, Michael & Pahnke, André & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Kranzusch, Peter, 2015. "Mittelstand zwischen Fakten und Gefühl," IfM-Materialien 234, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    12. Jeffery S. McMullen & Benjamin J. Warnick, 2016. "Should We Require Every New Venture to Be a Hybrid Organization?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 630-662, June.
    13. Per Davidsson & Johan Wiklund, 2001. "Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 81-100, July.
    14. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    15. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    16. Icks, Annette & Levering, Britta & Maaß, Frank & Werner, Arndt, 2015. "Chancen und Risiken von CSR im Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 236, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    17. Amanda Bullough & Maija Renko & Tamara Myatt, 2014. "Danger Zone Entrepreneurs: The Importance of Resilience and Self–Efficacy for Entrepreneurial Intentions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 473-499, May.
    18. Hermann Simon, 2009. "Hidden Champions of the Twenty-First Century," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-98147-5, December.
    19. G.T. Lumpkin & Keith H. Brigham & Todd W. Moss, 2010. "Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3-4), pages 241-264, May.
    20. Holz, Michael & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Brink, Siegrun & Icks, Annette & Welter, Friederike, 2019. "Bürokratiewahrnehmung von Unternehmen," IfM-Materialien 274, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    21. Backman, Mikaela & Palmberg, Johanna, 2015. "Contextualizing small family firms: How does the urban–rural context affect firm employment growth?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 247-258.
    22. Brink, Siegrun & Ivens, Sören & Nielen, Sebastian & Schlömer-Laufen, Nadine, 2018. "Neugegründete Unternehmen und ihre Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse anhand verschiedener Erfolgsdimensionen," IfM-Materialien 271, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    23. Pahnke, André & Welter, Friederike, 2019. "The German Mittelstand: Antithesis to the Silicon Valley entrepreneurship model?," Working Papers 01/19, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    24. Reza Zaefarian & Misagh Tasavori & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2015. "A Corporate Social Entrepreneurship Approach to Market-Based Poverty Reduction," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 320-334, March.
    25. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Reginald A. Litz, 2004. "Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(4), pages 335-354, July.
    26. Bijedić, Teita & Butkowski, Olivier K. & Kay, Rosemarie & Suprinovič, Olga, 2020. "Bestimmungsfaktoren des regionalen Gründungsgeschehens - eine Machbarkeitsstudie," IfM-Materialien 280, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    27. Pablo Muñoz & Jonathan Kimmitt & Ewald Kibler & Steffen Farny, 2019. "Living on the slopes: entrepreneurial preparedness in a context under continuous threat," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5-6), pages 413-434, May.
    28. Jack, Sarah L. & Anderson, Alistair R., 2002. "The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 467-487, September.
    29. Harvey, Charles & Maclean, Mairi & Suddaby, Roy, 2019. "Historical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 93(3), pages 443-471, October.
    30. Holz, Michael & Nielen, Sebastian & Paschke, Max & Schröder, Christian & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen, 2016. "Globale Vernetzung, Kooperation und Wertschöpfung im Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 252, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schlepphorst, Susanne & Welter, Friederike & Holz, Michael, 2022. "Die gesellschaftliche Wertschöpfung des Mittelstands," IfM-Materialien 292, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    2. Aurelia Bielawska, 2022. "Socially Responsible Activity of Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises—Benefits for the Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Welter, Friederike & Levering, Britta, 2021. "Mittelstand policy after the pandemic - for a sustainable future," Working Papers 02/21, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    4. Ann-Christin Grözinger & Sven Wolff & Philipp Julian Ruf & Petra Moog, 2022. "The power of shared positivity: organizational psychological capital and firm performance during exogenous crises," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 689-716, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pahnke, André & Holz, Michael & Welter, Friederike, 2019. "Unternehmerische Zielsysteme: Unterscheiden sich mittelständische Unternehmen tatsächlich von anderen?," IfM-Materialien 276, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    2. Pahnke, André & Welter, Friederike & Audretsch, David B., 2021. "Im Auge des Betrachters? Warum wir zwischen KMU und Mittelstand unterscheiden müssen," Working Papers 04/21, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    3. Stough, Roger & Welter, Friederike & Block, Joern & Wennberg, Karl & Basco, Rodrigo, 2015. "Family business and regional science: “Bridging the gap”," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 208-218.
    4. Matthias S. Johann & Jörn H. Block & Lena Benz, 2022. "Financial performance of hidden champions: Evidence from German manufacturing firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 873-892, October.
    5. André Pahnke & Friederike Welter & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "In the eye of the beholder? Differentiating between SMEs and Mittelstand," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 729-743, February.
    6. Schlömer-Laufen Nadine & Schneck Stefan, 2020. "Data for Mittelstand Companies in Germany at the IfM Bonn," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 240(6), pages 849-859, December.
    7. Karlsson, Johan, 2018. "Does regional context matter for family firm employment growth?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 293-310.
    8. Belitski, Maksim & Rejeb, Nada, 2022. "Does open customer innovation model hold for family firms?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 334-346.
    9. Basco, Rodrigo & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Spatial familiness and family spatialities—searching for fertile ground between family business and regional studies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 7-32.
    10. Kuckertz, Andreas & Brändle, Leif & Gaudig, Anja & Hinderer, Sebastian & Morales Reyes, Carlos Arturo & Prochotta, Alicia & Steinbrink, Kathrin M. & Berger, Elisabeth S.C., 2020. "Startups in times of crisis – A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    11. Bacq, Sophie & Hertel, Christina & Lumpkin, G.T., 2022. "Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(5).
    12. Anja Ströbele & Patrick Brecht & Lisa Kurz & Carsten H. Hahn, 2023. "Conceptualization of a Cooperative Company Builder for Systematic Transfer of University Research and Innovation in the German Mittelstand," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 9(4), pages 401-428, October.
    13. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    14. Bird, Miriam & Wennberg, Karl, 2014. "Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 421-436.
    15. Michael Berlemann & Vera Jahn & Robert Lehmann, 2022. "Is the German Mittelstand more resistant to crises?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1169-1195, October.
    16. Allan O’Connor & David Audretsch, 2023. "Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1051-1079, March.
    17. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Khan, Huda, 2022. "Social impact through family firms’ interorganizational relationships within a community and a cooperative: An embedded view of stewardship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 584-601.
    18. Arndt Werner & Christian Schröder & Simone Chlosta, 2018. "Driving factors of innovation in family and non-family SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 201-218, January.
    19. Kranzusch, Peter & Icks, Annette & Levering, Britta & Pasing, Philipp, 2019. "Herausforderungen für den Mittelstand - Update der Unternehmersicht 2019," IfM-Materialien 279, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    20. de Groote, Julia & Soluk, Jonas & Laue, Sarah-Larissa & Heck, Marius & Kammerlander, Nadine, 2023. "How can family-owned Mittelstand firms use their unique resources to master the digitalization age? The role of family historical, venture, and collaborative capital," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 133-152.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mittelstand; KMU; Gesellschaft; gesellschaftlicher Beitrag; Corona; German Mittelstand; SME; society; societal impact;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • L53 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Enterprise Policy
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmbode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.