Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Restructuring of Enterprise Social Assets in Russia: Trends, Problems, Possible Solutions


Author Info

  • L.M. Freinkman
  • I. Starodubrovskaya


Public enterprises in the formerly socialist countries have provided many social services to employees and the public, services that divert them from their core activities, raise their costs, and keep them from being competitive. How to deal with these social assets is a major problem in enterprise restructuring: large insolvent enterprises that provide many social services in a community often have the bargaining power to delay bankruptcy procedures and force the state to continue subsidizing them. But users of social services are not protected from enterprise managers'arbitrary actions or from a general deterioration in the level of services provided. As enterprises are restructured, the public sector must become involved in: 1) protecting critical services, such as kindergarten, that might otherwise disappear as enterprise funding is reduced; 2) facilitating reform of housing and health services, among others; 3) guaranteeing citizens'access to public services; and 4) reducing costs by rationalizing the management and provision of services. The authors analyze policy options in the restructuring of enterprises'social assets. They argue that the options differ depending on the benefits. Some benefits should remain as part of a traditional labor compensation package, and others should be privatized or transferred to municipal governments. Housing, especially, and child care facilities are services enterprises should not be in the business of providing.Divesting enterprises of housing is a transitional strategy on the way to transferring its ownership and management to the private sector. Unfortunately, the rules of the game under which municipal governments divest enterprises of housing are nontransparent and entirely under municipal control, and vested interests have many ways to postpone or block divestiture - even though most enterprise managers welcome it because it will reduce their costs and administrative burden. Social spending by Russian enterprises repres

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in its series Working Papers with number wp96052.

as in new window
Date of creation: May 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:wp96052

Contact details of provider:
Postal: A-2361 Laxenburg
Phone: +43-2236-807-0
Fax: +43-2236-71313
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research


Other versions of this item:


References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. S Estrin & M Schaffer & I.J. Singh, 1995. "The Provision of Social Benefits in State Owned," CEP Discussion Papers dp0223, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Freinkman, Lev & Gyulumyan, Gohar & Kyurumyan, Artak, 2002. "Quasi-fiscal activities, hidden government subsidies, and fiscal adjustment in Armenia," MPRA Paper 10064, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Martha de Melo & Gur Ofer & Plamen Yossifov, 2003. "Transition in Regional Capitals along the Volga," Public Economics, EconWPA 0302010, EconWPA.
  3. Schröder, Philipp J.H., 2000. "On Privatisation and Restructuring," MPRA Paper 89, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2006.
  4. Wihlborg, Clas, 2002. "Insolvency and Debt Recovery Procedures in Economic Development: An Overview of African Law," Working Paper Series, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER) UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  5. Philipp Schröder, 2003. "Insider Privatisation and Restructuring Incentives," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 333-349, December.
  6. Tuuli Juurikkala & Olga Lazareva, 2006. "Lobbying at the local level: social assets in Russian firms," Working Papers w0061, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
  7. Tuuli Juurikkala & Olga Lazareva, 2004. "To Divest or not to Divest? Social Assets in Russian Firms," ERSA conference papers ersa04p637, European Regional Science Association.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:wp96052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.