A new theoretical solution to the Behrens-Fisher (BF) problem is developed using empirical likelihood method. The sampling properties of the empirical likelihood ratio (ELR) test for the BF problem are derived using Monte Carlo simulation technique for a wide range of situations. A comparison of the size and power of the ELR test and the Welch-Aspin test is conducted for a special case of small sample sizes. The empirical results indicate that the ELR test for the BF problem has good power properties.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Victoria in its series Econometrics Working Papers with number
0404.
Length: 29 pages Date of creation: 06 Jul 2004 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:vic:vicewp:0404
Note: ISSN 1485-6441 Contact details of provider: Postal: PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8W 2Y2 Phone: (250)721-8540 Fax: (250)721-6214 Web page: http://web.uvic.ca/econ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (David Giles).
Find related papers by JEL classification: C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Hypothesis Testing C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods C16 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Econometric and Statistical Methods; Specific Distributions
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: