Mitigating “Anticommons” Harms to Research In Science and Technology
AbstractThere are three analytically distinct layers of the phenomenon or condition that has been labeled “the anticommons,” and indicted as a potential impediment that patenting and enforcement of IPR may impose on innovative activity. The first part of the paper distinguishes between the layers of “search costs”, “transactions costs”, and “multiple marginalization” effects in the pricing of licenses for commercial use of IP, pointing out the different resource allocation problems that are likely to arise in each layer from the distribution of ownership (or control) of perfect exclusion rights conveyed by intellectual property monopolies. Where information use-rights are gross complements (either in production or consumption) multiple marginalization results in an extreme form of “royalty stacking” that can pose serious impediments to investments in research and innovation. This phenomenon, presented here as the core of the anticommons, is a more specific problem than those associated with the patenting of research tools and, at the same time, is not confined to circumstances where patenting restricts access to the use of research tools.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research in its series Discussion Papers with number 10-009.
Date of creation: Jun 2009
Date of revision: Nov 2010
anticommons; multiple marginalization; patent hold-ups; distributed scientific databases; copyright collection societies; contractual commons; common-use licensing; public R&D; Bayh-Dole Act;
Other versions of this item:
- David, Paul A., 2011. "Mitigating 'anticommons' harms to research in science and technology," MERIT Working Papers 001, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
- L24 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Contracting Out; Joint Ventures
- O31 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
- O34 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
- O38 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Christian Helmers, 2011.
"Innovation and Diffusion of Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help?,"
NBER Working Papers
16920, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hall, Bronwyn H. & Helmers, Christian, 2013. "Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 33-51.
- Hall, Bronwyn H. & Helmers, Christian, 2011. "Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help?," MERIT Working Papers 025, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anne Shor).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.