We study the choice between a traditional technology characterized by known risks and an innovative technology (a geological storages for nuclear wastes, a genetically modified organism or a new treatment in medical science) subject to scientific uncertainty. We assume that the two technologies differ in first period implementation costs, second period risk, and degree of irreversibility, and we study the effect of foreseen scientific progress on the present choice between the two. If the first-period choice is restricted to be 'all or nothing', scientific progress promotes the traditional technology; with constant absolute risk aversion, scientific progress increases the optimal level of the technology with the higher implementation cost.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy in its series CSEF Working Papers with number
74.
Length: Date of creation: 01 Dec 2001 Date of revision: Publication status: Published as “Uncertainty and the cost of reversal”, in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 30 (2005), pages 119-128 Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:74
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.