This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Klassifizierung von Hedge-Fonds durch das k-means Clustering von Self-Organizing Maps: eine renditebasierte Analyse zur Selbsteinstufungsgüte und Stiländerungsproblematik
[Classifying Hedge Funds using k-means Clustering of Self-Organizing Maps: a return-based analysis of misclassification and the problem of style creep]

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Deetz, Marcus
Poddig, Thorsten
Varmaz, Armin

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Through an implementation of the 2-level-approach due to Vesanto & Alhoniemi (2000), this paper addresses a number of problems typically seen when visualized interpretation of Self Organizing Maps (SOM) are applied to derive a systematic classification system in the hedge fund literature. Normally, a trained SOM does not result in an exact depiction of the detected structures of the input data, and is therefore challenging for visual interpretations. The 2-level-approach overcomes this problem and assures a consistent clustering of neighboring output units, and therefore an objective classification scheme. Through an empirical application, such an objective classification is derived. Building on this, further analyses concerning the misclassification and style creep problems are conducted. Within the ten-year sample period (31.01.1999 to 31.12.2008), which comprises 2789 hedge funds, organized in eleven strategies, six classes can be identified. This six-class taxonomy is fairly robust to different sub-sample periods, topologies and data-samples. According to the classification system applied here, it is shown that most of the analyzed hedge funds are inconsistent in their self-declared strategies. Furthermore, evidence of undisclosed trading style changes over time is identified – specifically, it is shown that misclassified hedge funds are more likely to change their trading style.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16939/
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 16939.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 25 Aug 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:16939

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

Related research
Keywords: Self-Organizing Maps; Clustering; Klassifzierung; Hedge-Fonds; Style Creep;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Pension Funds; Other Private Financial Institutions
C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Microeconomic Data

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Brown, Stephen J. & Goetzmann, William N., 1997. "Mutual fund styles," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 373-399, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Fung, William & Hsieh, David A, 1997. "Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds," Review of Financial Studies, Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(2), pages 275-302.
  3. Mangiameli, Paul & Chen, Shaw K. & West, David, 1996. "A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 402-417, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Carl Ackermann & Richard McEnally & David Ravenscraft, 1999. "The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk, Return, and Incentives," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(3), pages 833-874, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Glenn Milligan & Martha Cooper, 1985. "An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set," Psychometrika, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 159-179, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Fung, William & Hsieh, David A, 2001. "The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Trend Followers," Review of Financial Studies, Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 313-41.
  7. Stephen J. Brown & William N. Goetzmann, 2004. "Hedge Funds With Style," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm21, Yale School of Management. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.