IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pie/dsedps/2021-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Citizen-Generated Data and Official Statistics: an application to SDG indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Pratesi
  • Claudio Ceccarelli
  • Stefano Menghinello

Abstract

Official statistics are collected and produced by national statistical institutions (NSIs) based upon standardized questionnaire forms and a priori designed survey frame. Although the response to NSIs' surveys is mandatory for respondent units, increasing disaffection in replying to official surveys is a common trend across many advanced countries. This work explores the possibility to use Citizen-Generated Data (CGD) as a new information source for the compilation of official statistics. CGD represent a unique and still unexploited data source that share some key characteristics with Big Data, while they present some specific features in terms of information relevance and data generating process. Given the relevance of CGD to reduce the information gap between the demand and supply of new or more robust Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) indicators, the experimental setting to assess the data quality of CGD refers to different ways to integrate official statistics and CGD. Istat collects CGD within the framework of a pilot survey focused on key SDG indicators, and the appropriate methodological approach to assess data quality for official statistics is defined according to different data integration modalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Pratesi & Claudio Ceccarelli & Stefano Menghinello, 2021. "Citizen-Generated Data and Official Statistics: an application to SDG indicators," Discussion Papers 2021/274, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    • Handle: RePEc:pie:dsedps:2021/274
    Note: ISSN 2039-1854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ec.unipi.it/documents/Ricerca/papers/2021-274.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gertler, Paul J, 1988. "A Latent-Variable Model of Quality Determination," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 6(1), pages 97-104, January.
    2. Di Zio, Marco & Guarnera, Ugo & Rocci, Roberto, 2007. "A mixture of mixture models for a classification problem: The unity measure error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2573-2585, February.
    3. Vermunt, Jeroen K. & Magidson, Jay, 2003. "Latent class models for classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 531-537, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redivo, Edoardo & Nguyen, Hien D. & Gupta, Mayetri, 2020. "Bayesian clustering of skewed and multimodal data using geometric skewed normal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Stanislav Avsec, 2023. "Design Thinking to Envision More Sustainable Technology-Enhanced Teaching for Effective Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Andrew K. Rose & Mark M. Spiegel, 2010. "Cross‐Country Causes And Consequences Of The 2008 Crisis: International Linkages And American Exposure," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 340-363, August.
    4. Adem, Jan & Gochet, Willy, 2004. "Aggregating classifiers with mathematical programming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 791-807, November.
    5. Maaz Gardezi & J. Gordon Arbuckle, 2019. "Spatially Representing Vulnerability to Extreme Rain Events Using Midwestern Farmers’ Objective and Perceived Attributes of Adaptive Capacity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 17-34, January.
    6. Bolger, Michelle A., 2018. "Predicting arrest probability across time: An exploration of competing risk perspectives," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 92-109.
    7. Marco Di Zio & Ugo Guarnera, 2010. "A multiple imputation approach to deal with the unity measure error," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(3), pages 431-444, August.
    8. Caspar G Chorus, 2018. "Paving the way towards superstar destinations: Models of convex demand for quality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 161-179, January.
    9. Patterson, Paul M. & Richards, Timothy J., 1998. "Print Advertisement Characteristics and Apple Variety Attraction: A Mimic Model Approach," Working Papers 28537, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    10. Paul J. Gertler, 1989. "Medicaid and the Cost of Improving Access to Nursing Home Care," NBER Working Papers 2851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Skreli, Engjell & Imami, Drini, 2012. "Analyzing Consumers’ Preferences for Apple Attributes in Tirana, Albania," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Gioacchino Fazio & Francesca Giambona & Erasmo Vassallo & Elli Vassiliadis, 2018. "A Measure of Trust: The Italian Regional Divide in a Latent Class Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 209-242, November.
    13. Silvia Cagnone & Cinzia Viroli, 2014. "A factor mixture model for analyzing heterogeneity and cognitive structure of dementia," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 98(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Valenzuela, Marcus A. & Flinchbaugh, Carol & Rogers, Sean Edmund, 2020. "Can organizations help adjust?: The effect of perceived organizational climate on immigrants' acculturation and consequent effect on perceived fit," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    15. Luca De Angelis, 2013. "Latent class models for financial data analysis: some statistical developments," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(2), pages 227-242, June.
    16. Paul J. Gertler & Donald M. Waldman, 1990. "Quality Adjusted Cost Functions," NBER Working Papers 3567, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Estrella Díaz & David Martín-Consuegra & Hooman Estelami, 2016. "A persuasive-based latent class segmentation analysis of luxury brand websites," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 401-424, September.
    18. Videras, Julio & Owen, Ann L. & Conover, Emily & Wu, Stephen, 2012. "The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 35-50.
    19. Oppewal, Harmen & Paas, Leonard J. & Crouch, Geoffrey I. & Huybers, Twan, 2010. "Segmenting consumers based on how they spend a tax rebate: An analysis of the Australian stimulus payment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 510-519, August.
    20. Fok, Dennis & Paap, Richard & Franses, Philip Hans, 2012. "Modeling dynamic effects of promotion on interpurchase times," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3055-3069.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Citizen-Generated Data (CGD); National statistical Institutions (NSIs); Sustainable Development Goals (SDG); Official statistics (OS); Data Science; Latent variables models; civil society organizations (CSOs);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pie:dsedps:2021/274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dspisit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.