IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nys/sunysb/18-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intuitive Solutions in Game Representations: The Shapley Value Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Pradeep Dubey

Abstract

We show that any transferable utility game can be represented by an assignment of facilities to the players, in which it is intuitively obvious how to allocate the total cost of the facilities. The intuitive solution in the representation turns out to be the Shapley value of the game.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradeep Dubey, 2018. "Intuitive Solutions in Game Representations: The Shapley Value Revisited," Department of Economics Working Papers 18-01, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:nys:sunysb:18-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/economics/research/papers/2018/GameRepresentations_1801.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pradeep Dubey, 1982. "The Shapley Value as Aircraft Landing Fees--Revisited," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(8), pages 869-874, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pradeep Dubey, 2024. "Equitable Solutions in Game Representations: An Extension of the Shapley Value," Department of Economics Working Papers 24-01, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    2. Pradeep Dubey, 2024. "Game Representations and Extensions of the Shapley Value," Papers 2401.09845, arXiv.org.
    3. Pradeep Dubey, 2018. "Equitable Solutions in Game Representations and the Shapley Value," Department of Economics Working Papers 18-11, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngsub Chun & Boram Park, 2016. "The airport problem with capacity constraints," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 20(3), pages 237-253, September.
    2. Csóka, Péter & Illés, Ferenc & Solymosi, Tamás, 2022. "On the Shapley value of liability games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 378-386.
    3. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moulin, Hervé, 2014. "Sharing the cost of redundant items," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 339-352.
    4. Paula Jaramillo, 2013. "Congestion in irrigation problems," Documentos CEDE 10553, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Vásquez-Brage, M. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M. & García-Jurado, I., 1995. "Owen's coalitional value and aircraft landing fees," Discussion Paper 1995-104, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Grahame F. Thompson, 2020. "Deal or no deal? Some reflections on the ‘Baker-Thompson rule,’ ‘matching,’ and ‘market design’," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 652-662, September.
    7. Potters, Jos & Sudholter, Peter, 1999. "Airport problems and consistent allocation rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 83-102, July.
    8. Stefano Moretti & Fioravante Patrone, 2008. "Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-41, July.
    9. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    10. Norde, Henk & Fragnelli, Vito & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & Patrone, Fioravante & Tijs, Stef, 2002. "Balancedness of infrastructure cost games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 635-654, February.
    11. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Tvede, Mich & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2013. "Cost Sharing in Chains and Other Fixed Trees," Discussion Papers on Economics 12/2013, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    12. Juan Aparicio & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2008. "Depreciation games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 205-218, February.
    13. Vásquez-Brage, M. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M. & García-Jurado, I., 1995. "Owen's coalitional value and aircraft landing fees," Other publications TiSEM 3f2bc27b-b5c8-4517-8ffd-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Pradeep Dubey, 2018. "Equitable Solutions in Game Representations and the Shapley Value," Department of Economics Working Papers 18-11, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    15. Stef Tijs & Gert-Jan Otten, 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 1(1), pages 1-36, December.
    16. Koster, M.A.L. & Molina, E. & Sprumont, Y. & Tijs, S.H., 1998. "Core Representations of the Standard Fixed Tree Game," Discussion Paper 1998-21, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    17. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Daniel Granot & Frieda Granot & Greys Sošić & Hailong Cui, 2021. "Incentives and Emission Responsibility Allocation in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4172-4190, July.
    18. Hiller Tobias, 2021. "Who Bears an Employee’s Special Annual Payment?," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 223-237, March.
    19. Pradeep Dubey, 2024. "Game Representations and Extensions of the Shapley Value," Papers 2401.09845, arXiv.org.
    20. Danny Ben-Shahar & Yongheng Deng & Eyal Sulganik, 2006. "Shapley Cost Allocation Coincides with Relative Status: The Case of Skyscrapers," Working Paper 8567, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D79 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nys:sunysb:18-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edstous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.