Recent studies on trade policy for low-income countries have established that high transport costs associated with poor quality infrastructure in countries such as Uganda represent a barrier to trade and an additional source of protection to domestic producers of import competing goods. This study updates and extends the analysis of Milner et al (2000) for Uganda in the 1994 to compare with the situation in the early 2000s. The results show that trade policy barriers have been further reduced and, in general, transport costs have fallen, although not dramatically. Transport costs remain a significant trade barrier, equivalent to effective protection of over 20% and an implicit tax on exports of over 25% (and up to 50% on air freight). Simulation of the protection effects under the new EAC Customs Union shows that overall the level of tariff protection will increase but any adverse impacts could be offset by greater efficiency at Customs and ports and additional investment to reduce infrastructure-related transport costs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Nottingham, CREDIT in its series Discussion Papers with number
06/09.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: