IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nmp/nuland/2867.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Riesgos psicosociales y satisfacción laboral en docentes de una universidad pública argentina: explorando el rol del work engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Pujol-Cols, Lucas J.

Abstract

Fundamentación: La profesión académica se ha convertido en una ocupación altamente estresante. Como resultado, la literatura tradicionalmente se ha concentrado en los efectos nocivos de los riesgos psicosociales, ignorando en un grado considerable los mecanismos que conducen a la conservación de actitudes positivas frente a los estresores laborales. Objetivos: (1) Estimar la prevalencia de riesgos psicosociales en el trabajo (i.e. exigencias psicológicas, insuficiente autonomía, falta de apoyo social y liderazgo, doble presencia e inseguridad sobre el futuro) en una muestra de docentes de una Universidad Pública Argentina, (2) Analizar la influencia de un conjunto de variables sociodemográficas (i.e. edad, género y nivel educativo) y laborales (i.e. jerarquía del cargo, antigüedad en el cargo actual y dedicación) sobre la percepción de exposición a riesgos psicosociales, (3) Analizar el rol mediador y moderador del Work Engagement en la relación entre percepción de exposición a riesgos psicosociales y satisfacción laboral. Materiales y métodos: Se administró un cuestionario de auto-informe a un total de 177 docentes pertenecientes a una Universidad Pública Argentina. El mismo incluyó tres escalas: la versión reducida del Copsoq-Istas 21, el BIAJS y UWES-9. Se utilizaron distintas técnicas de análisis multivariado, incluyendo Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio, ecuaciones estructurales, análisis de regresión múltiple y análisis de regresiones jerárquicas. Resultados: Se observó una elevada prevalencia de doble presencia, exigencias psicológicas e insuficiente estima. El Work Engagement medió en forma total la relación entre percepción de exposición a riesgos psicosociales y satisfacción laboral. Se identificaron tres interacciones significativas, sugiriendo que el Work Engagement modera los efectos de los riesgos psicosociales sobre la satisfacción laboral de los docentes. Conclusiones: Resulta esencial que las Universidades introduzcan cambios en la organización del trabajo, que propendan a reducir las demandas laborales y/o a incrementar los recursos laborales con el propósito de mitigar su impacto psicosocial sobre los docentes, en particular en aquellos aspectos ligados a la doble presencia, las exigencias psicológicas y la estima. Es vital que las Universidades diseñen estrategias que conduzcan a incrementar el Work Engagement en la medida en que pareciera ayudar a los académicos a enfrentar los riesgos psicosociales a los que se ven expuestos en sus trabajos. Se discuten las limitaciones de este estudio y las implicancias del mismo para la gestión universitaria. También se proponen líneas futuras de investigación.

Suggested Citation

  • Pujol-Cols, Lucas J., 2017. "Riesgos psicosociales y satisfacción laboral en docentes de una universidad pública argentina: explorando el rol del work engagement," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2867, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    • Handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:2867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/id/eprint/2867/1/pujol-2017.pdf
    File Function: accepted
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    2. Jean Waltman & Inger Bergom & Carol Hollenshead & Jeanne Miller & Louise August, 2012. "Factors Contributing to Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction among Non-Tenure-Track Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 411-434, May.
    3. Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin, 2008. "The Meaning of Employee Engagement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-30, March.
    4. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    5. William D. Reisel & Tahira M. Probst & Swee-Lim Chia & Cesar M. Maloles & Cornelius J. König, 2010. "The Effects of Job Insecurity on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Deviant Behavior, and Negative Emotions of Employees," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 74-91, January.
    6. Kenneth A. Bollen, 1989. "A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 303-316, February.
    7. Piia Seppälä & Saija Mauno & Taru Feldt & Jari Hakanen & Ulla Kinnunen & Asko Tolvanen & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2009. "The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 459-481, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lara, Francisco J. & Salas-Vallina, Andres, 2017. "Managerial competencies, innovation and engagement in SMEs: The mediating role of organisational learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 152-160.
    2. Edward P. O’Connor & Marian Crowley-Henry, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship Between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 903-917, June.
    3. Francoise Contreras & Juan C. Espinosa & Gustavo A. Esguerra, 2020. "Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    4. Nina Pološki Vokić & Tomislav Hernaus, 2015. "The triad of job satisfaction, work engagement and employee loyalty – The interplay among the concepts," EFZG Working Papers Series 1507, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    5. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Urmila Rani Srivastava & Vandana Maurya, 2017. "Organizational and Individual Level Antecedents of Psychological Capital and its Associated Outcomes: Development of a Conceptual Framework," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(3), pages 205-236, August.
    7. Pujol-Cols, Lucas J. & Arraigada, Mariana Cecilia, 2017. "Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Riesgos Psicosociales Copsoq-Istas 21 y aplicación en docentes universitarios argentinos," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2943, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    8. Widdy Muhammad Sabar Wibawa & Yoshi Takahashi, 2021. "The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Work Engagement and Workaholism: Examining Self-Efficacy as a Moderator," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Shantz, Amanda & Alfes, Kerstin & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 48156, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Neha Gupta & Vandna Sharma, 2016. "Exploring Employee Engagement—A Way to Better Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 45-63, June.
    11. Pujol-Cols, Lucas J. & Dabos, Guillermo E., 2019. "Dispositional and situational factors at work: A validation of scales and examination of effects on job satisfaction," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3203, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    12. Rawan Alafeshat & Cem Tanova, 2019. "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Vandana Tamta & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Linking Emotional Intelligence to Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: Organizational Justice and Work Engagement as Mediators," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1580-1596, December.
    14. Indy Wijngaards & Owen C. King & Martijn J. Burger & Job Exel, 2022. "Worker Well-Being: What it Is, and how it Should Be Measured," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 795-832, April.
    15. Barbara Sypniewska & Małgorzata Baran & Monika Kłos, 2023. "Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management – based on the study of Polish employees," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1069-1100, September.
    16. Simon L. Albrecht & Camille R. Green & Andrew Marty, 2021. "Meaningful Work, Job Resources, and Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Or Shkoler & Aharon Tziner, 2020. "Leadership Styles as Predictors of Work Attitudes: A Moderated–Mediation Link," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 164-164, February.
    18. Abu Shams Mohammad Mahmudul Hoque & Zainudin Bin Awang & Benazir Ahmed Siddiqui & Malam Salihu Sabiu, 2018. "Role of Employee Engagement on Compensation System and Employee Performance Relationship among Telecommunication Service Providers in Bangladesh," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 1937-1937, December.
    19. Jacob Wood & Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2016. "Work engagement in organizations: a social network analysis of the domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 317-336, October.
    20. Piia Seppälä & Lotta K. Harju & Jari J. Hakanen, 2020. "Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes," Post-Print hal-03188191, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:2867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian Merlino S. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femdpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.