IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mil/wpdepa/2015-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is the Oecd Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from Codelco Case, Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco CASTAÑEDA
  • Diego BARRÍA
  • Germán ASTORGA

Abstract

The public enterprise has returned to play a visible role in world economies. The privatization wave experienced by the world, with different intensities depending on the region since the 1970s, failed in eliminating state enterprises control from the economic sphere. Actually, public enterprises refuse to disappear at all, even in higly market-oriented economies, as the Chilean one. Enterprises that remain in the hands of the Chilean State have been managed, increasingly, under a private logic, inspired by notions of corporate governance of the OECD. However, an enterprise, CODELCO (National Copper Corporation of Chile by its acronym in Spanish), one of the largest state-owned copper enterprises in the world, has not fully entered into that scheme. Both the Pinochet dictatorship (1973-1990) and the subsequent democratic governments have considered CODELCO as strategic, mainly by the amount of resources it provides to the treasury. This document is twofold. On the one hand, to characterize CODELCO to subsequently discuss whether it is appropriate that this enterprise fits all "best practices" that the OECD has identified for SOEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco CASTAÑEDA & Diego BARRÍA & Germán ASTORGA, 2015. "Is the Oecd Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from Codelco Case, Chile," Departmental Working Papers 2015-19, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
  • Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2015-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2015/DEMM-2015_19wp.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Oliver, 1995. "Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 105(430), pages 678-689, May.
    2. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Advanced Economies: Lessons in a Post Financial Crash Era.. Introduction to the Special Issue," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 74(4), pages 419-424.
    2. Marwa Elnahass & Kamil Omoteso & Aly Salama & Vu Quang Trinh, 2020. "Differential market valuations of board busyness across alternative banking models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 201-238, July.
    3. Ahmad, Sardar & Akbar, Saeed & Halari, Anwar & Shah, Syed Zubair, 2021. "Organizational non-compliance with principles-based governance provisions and corporate risk-taking," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Francisco CASTAÑEDA & Diego BARRÍA & Germán ASTORGA, 2015. "Is the OECD Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from CODELCO Case, Chile," CIRIEC Working Papers 1518, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    5. Julio Segura, 2004. "Competencia, disciplina de mercado y regulación en presencia de conflictos de interés en las empresas," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 169(2), pages 135-170, June.
    6. Monika Singla & Shveta Singh, 2018. "Impact of Institutional Set-Up on the Responsiveness to Change in a Firm’s Governance Structure: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Sector Enterprises in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 159-172, June.
    7. Jacques-Laurent Ravix & Yiping Qu & Jackie Krafft, 2011. "Gouvernance d’entreprise et performances sectorielles : une réévaluation de la fiabilité des scores et des mesures de bonne gouvernance," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 197(1), pages 145-158.
    8. Hristos Doucouliagos & Janto Haman & T.D. Stanley, 2012. "Pay for Performance and Corporate Governance Reform," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 670-703, July.
    9. Emma L. Schultz & David T. Tan & Kathleen D. Walsh, 2010. "Endogeneity and the corporate governance - performance relation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 35(2), pages 145-163, August.
    10. Ahmed, Anwer S. & Duellman, Scott, 2007. "Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 411-437, July.
    11. Marghoob Enam & Syed Noorul Shajar & Niladri Das, 2023. "Non-Monotonic Relationship between Corporate Governance and Banks’ Operating Performance—The Moderating Role of CEO Duality: Evidence from Selected Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Bauguess, Scott & Stegemoller, Mike, 2008. "Protective governance choices and the value of acquisition activity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 550-566, December.
    13. Sheeba Kapil & Rakesh K Mishra, 2019. "Corporate Governance structure and firm performance in Indian context: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Working Papers 1937, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    14. Ruiz-Verdú, Pablo, 2007. "Corporate governance when managers set their own pay," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb070803, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    15. Aldrighi, Dante Mendes, 2003. "The Mechanisms of Corporate Governance in the United States: an Assessment," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 57(3), July.
    16. Zofia Patora-Wysocka & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Incremental Organizational Change—A Case of the Textile and Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Bayer, Christian & Burhop, Carsten, 2009. "Corporate governance and incentive contracts: Historical evidence from a legal reform," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 464-481, October.
    18. Khushboo Gulati & Seema Gupta & C. P. Gupta, 2020. "The Transformation of Governance System: A Decade Long Experience of Corporate Governance Using Meta-analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 233-262, September.
    19. Jackie Krafft & Yiping Qu & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate governance, industry dynamics and firms performance on the stock market," Post-Print hal-00203544, HAL.
    20. Chen-Yu Chang & Hui-Yu Chou & Ming-Teh Wang, 2006. "Characterizing the corporate governance of UK listed construction companies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 647-656.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    State Enterprises; State Corporate Governance; Financing; Latin America; Chile;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2015-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: DEMM Working Papers (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damilit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.