IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crc/wpaper/1518.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is the OECD Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from CODELCO Case, Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco CASTAÑEDA

    (Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • Diego BARRÍA

    (Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • Germán ASTORGA

    (Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

Abstract

This academic work address about the Chilean state owned company (CODELCO) and how it deals with the recommendations of OECD in order to define determined corporate governance. The core of this work is based on establishing a critic analysis to these guidelines.In the last decades, state owned companies (SOEs) have returned to play a visible role in world economies. The privatization wave experienced by the world, with different intensities depending on the region since the 1970s, was not successful and weakened the extent of intervention of SOEs across economics. Large enterprises survived and in recent years, for example in Latin America, a new phenomenon has emerged: the renationalisation of enterprises previously privatized. This is even evident in economies like Chile, in which between 1970s and 1990s, many of the then SOEs were privatized. Enterprises that remain in the hands of the Chilean State have been managed, increasingly, under a total private logic, inspired by notions of corporate governance of the OECD. However, a SOE, CODELCO (National Copper Corporation of Chile), one of the largest state-owned copper enterprises in the world, has not fully entered into that scheme. Both the Pinochet dictatorship (1973- 1990) and the later democratic governments have considered CODELCO as strategic, due to its contribution to the national budget.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco CASTAÑEDA & Diego BARRÍA & Germán ASTORGA, 2015. "Is the OECD Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from CODELCO Case, Chile," CIRIEC Working Papers 1518, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  • Handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:1518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ciriec.uliege.be/repec/WP15-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Oliver, 1995. "Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 105(430), pages 678-689, May.
    2. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Advanced Economies: Lessons in a Post Financial Crash Era.. Introduction to the Special Issue," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 74(4), pages 419-424.
    2. Marwa Elnahass & Kamil Omoteso & Aly Salama & Vu Quang Trinh, 2020. "Differential market valuations of board busyness across alternative banking models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 201-238, July.
    3. Ahmad, Sardar & Akbar, Saeed & Halari, Anwar & Shah, Syed Zubair, 2021. "Organizational non-compliance with principles-based governance provisions and corporate risk-taking," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Julio Segura, 2004. "Competencia, disciplina de mercado y regulación en presencia de conflictos de interés en las empresas," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 169(2), pages 135-170, June.
    5. Monika Singla & Shveta Singh, 2018. "Impact of Institutional Set-Up on the Responsiveness to Change in a Firm’s Governance Structure: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Sector Enterprises in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 159-172, June.
    6. Francisco CASTAÑEDA & Diego BARRÍA & Germán ASTORGA, 2015. "Is the Oecd Model Suitable for Strategic Public Enterprises in Terms of National Development? Reflections from Codelco Case, Chile," Departmental Working Papers 2015-19, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Jacques-Laurent Ravix & Yiping Qu & Jackie Krafft, 2011. "Gouvernance d’entreprise et performances sectorielles : une réévaluation de la fiabilité des scores et des mesures de bonne gouvernance," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 197(1), pages 145-158.
    8. Hristos Doucouliagos & Janto Haman & T.D. Stanley, 2012. "Pay for Performance and Corporate Governance Reform," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 670-703, July.
    9. Emma L. Schultz & David T. Tan & Kathleen D. Walsh, 2010. "Endogeneity and the corporate governance - performance relation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 35(2), pages 145-163, August.
    10. Ahmed, Anwer S. & Duellman, Scott, 2007. "Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 411-437, July.
    11. Marghoob Enam & Syed Noorul Shajar & Niladri Das, 2023. "Non-Monotonic Relationship between Corporate Governance and Banks’ Operating Performance—The Moderating Role of CEO Duality: Evidence from Selected Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Bauguess, Scott & Stegemoller, Mike, 2008. "Protective governance choices and the value of acquisition activity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 550-566, December.
    13. Sheeba Kapil & Rakesh K Mishra, 2019. "Corporate Governance structure and firm performance in Indian context: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Working Papers 1937, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    14. Ruiz-Verdú, Pablo, 2007. "Corporate governance when managers set their own pay," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb070803, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    15. Aldrighi, Dante Mendes, 2003. "The Mechanisms of Corporate Governance in the United States: an Assessment," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 57(3), July.
    16. Zofia Patora-Wysocka & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Incremental Organizational Change—A Case of the Textile and Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Bayer, Christian & Burhop, Carsten, 2009. "Corporate governance and incentive contracts: Historical evidence from a legal reform," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 464-481, October.
    18. Khushboo Gulati & Seema Gupta & C. P. Gupta, 2020. "The Transformation of Governance System: A Decade Long Experience of Corporate Governance Using Meta-analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 233-262, September.
    19. Jackie Krafft & Yiping Qu & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate governance, industry dynamics and firms performance on the stock market," Post-Print hal-00203544, HAL.
    20. Chen-Yu Chang & Hui-Yu Chou & Ming-Teh Wang, 2006. "Characterizing the corporate governance of UK listed construction companies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 647-656.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    State owned enterprise (SOE); Performance; OECD Guidelines; Corporate Governance; National Budget;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:1518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CIRIEC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciulgbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.