This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
David Colander ()
Richard P.F. Holt
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We attempt to clarify divisions made by us in previous work (Colander et al., 2004a,b) between “orthodox, mainstream, and heterodox” in economics, following very useful remarks in Dequech (2007), whom we thank. We also provide specific advice for heterodox economists, namely: worry less about methodology, focus on being economists first and heterodox economists second, and prepare ideas to leave the incubator of heterodoxy to enter the mainstream economic debate.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0704.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Middlebury College, Department of Economics in its series Middlebury College Working Paper Series with number 0704.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 15 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0704

Contact details of provider:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Janine Podraza).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. R. Koppl, 2006. "Austrian economics at the cutting edge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 231-241, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Olivier Blanchard, 2000. "What Do We Know About Macroeconomics That Fisher And Wicksell Did Not?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1375-1409, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. David Colander, 2000. "The Death Of Neoclassical Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 127-143, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. David Colander & Richard Holt & Barkley Rosser, Jr, 2004. "The changing face of mainstream economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 485-499, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Davis, John B., 2006. "The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(01), pages 1-20, April. [Downloadable!]
  6. Tony Lawson, 2006. "The nature of heterodox economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 483-505, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. David Colander, 2003. "Post Walrasian Macroeconomics and Heterodoxy : Thinking Outside the Heterodox Box," International Journal of Political Economy, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 68-81, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Want to help out with this project? Look for volunteer opportunities.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-9.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.