Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics
AbstractThis paper discusses the concepts of neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics, distinguishing temporally more general and more specific concepts. The concept of mainstream economics is based on prestige and influence and includes ideas taught in prestigious schools. Although the current mainstream (neoclassical economics included) is clearly diverse, commonality in it is more controversial. Heterodox economics can be defined negatively, in opposition either to the orthodoxy or to the mainstream. The lack of consensus generates communication problems. Another possibility would be to define heterodox economics positively, but the result in the current period may be an empty set.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.
Volume (Year): 30 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (December)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=109348
heterodox; mainstream; neoclassical; orthodox; schools of thought;
Other versions of this item:
- David Dequech, 2007. "Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, And Heterodox Economics," Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 35th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 043, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pósgraduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- David Colander & Richard P.F. Holt & J. Barkley Rosser, 2007.
"Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics,"
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,
M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 303-312, December.
- David Colander & Richard P.F. Holt & J. Barkley Rosser, Jr., 2007. "Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0704, Middlebury College, Department of Economics.
- Andrew Mearman, 2011.
"Who Do Heterodox Economists Think They Are?,"
American Journal of Economics and Sociology,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 480-510, 04.
- Andrew Mearman, 2010. "What is this thing called ‘heterodox economics’?," Working Papers 1006, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
- Fontana Magda, 2009. "The Santa Fe Perspective on Economics: emerging patterns in the science of complexity," CESMEP Working Papers 200908, University of Turin.
- Matías Vernengo, 2009.
"Conversation or Monologue? On Advising Heterodox Economists,"
Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah
2009_11, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
- MatÃas Vernengo, 2010. "Conversation or monologue? on advising heterodox economists," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 389-396, April.
- James P. Gander, 2009. "Firm Debt Structure and Firm Size," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2009_09, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
- Engelbert Stockhammer & Paul Ramskogler, 2009.
"Post-Keynesian economics How to move forward,"
European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention,
Edward Elgar, vol. 6(2), pages 227-246.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.