Political Institutions and Public Policy: The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union and the Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
AbstractIn this paper we study the implications of the introduction of the co-decision procedure for the European Unionâ€™s Common Agricultural Policy and its reform. We use a game-theoretical model of the legislative procedures in the European Union and show that the move from consultation to co-decision implies a shift of power from the Commission to the European Parliament. The implications for the Common Agricultural Policy depend on the configuration of preferences, the location of the status quo, and the bargaining powers in the Conciliation Committee. If the member states and the European Parliament are more opposed to reform than is the Commission, the introduction of co-decision reduces the prospects for reform of the European Unionâ€™s Common Agricultural Policy.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven in its series LICOS Discussion Papers with number 28611.
Date of creation: 2011
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: De Bériotstraat 34, B-3000 Leuven
Phone: +32 (0) 16 / 32 6598
Fax: +32 (0) 16 / 32 6599
Web page: http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/licos
More information through EDIRC
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Simon Hix & Amie Kreppel & Abdul Noury, 2003.
"The Party System in the European Parliament: Collusive or Competitive?,"
Journal of Common Market Studies,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 309-331, 04.
- Abdul Ghafar Noury & Simon Hix & Amie Kreppel, 2003. "The party system in the European Parliament: collusive or competitive?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/7758, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Berthold Rittberger, 2003. "The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 203-225, 04.
- Richard Corbett & Francis Jacobs & Michael Shackleton, 2003. "The European Parliament at Fifty: A View from the Inside," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 353-373, 04.
- Andreas Maurer, 2003. "The Legislative Powers and Impact of the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 227-247, 04.
- -, 2003. "Fifty years of politická ekonomie," Politická ekonomie, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2003(1).
- David Earnshaw & David Judge, 1993. "The European Parliament and the Sweeteners Directive: From Footnote to Inter-Institutional Conflict," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 103-116, 03.
- David Earnshaw & David Judge, 1997. "The Life and Times of the European Union's Co-operation Procedure," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 543-564, December.
- Christophe Crombez, 2000. "Institutional Reform and Co-Decision in the European Union," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 41-57, March.
- Christopher Lord, 2003. "The European Parliament in the Economic Governance of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 249-267, 04.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.