IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isd/wpaper/76.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Jakoœæ ¿ycia gospodarstw domowych w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Panek

    (Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

Wzrost jakoœci ¿ycia spo³eczeñstwa stanowi nadrzêdny cel zarówno polityki spo³ecznej jak i gospodarczej na szczeblu krajowym, regionalnym i lokalnym. W ostatnim dwudziestoleciu obserwujemy w kolejnych traktatach Unii Europejskiej coraz wyraŸniejsze eksponowanie jako jednego z celów UE utrzymanie równowagi pomiêdzy rozwojem gospodarczym i rozwojem spo³ecznym, przy zachowaniu œrodowiska naturalnego oraz dziedzictwa kulturowego. Wzrost jakoœci ¿ycia i spójnoœci spo³ecznej jest tak¿e jednym z istotnych celów unijnej strategii Europa 2020. Poprawa jakoœci ¿ycia Polaków, poprzez zapewnienie stabilnego i wysokiego wzrostu gospodarczego, jest tak¿e g³ównym celem polskiej D³ugookresowej Strategii Rozwoju Kraju do 2030 r. oraz Œredniookresowej Strategii Rozwoju Kraju 2020. Prace nad stworzeniem systemu wskaŸników monitoruj¹cych jakoœæ ¿ycia prowadzone s¹ od wielu lat przez instytucje miêdzynarodowe. UE i jej pañstwa cz³onkowskie opracowa³y i od lat stosuj¹ w praktyce szerok¹ gamê wskaŸników spo³ecznych i œrodowiskowych, czêsto wystêpuj¹cych w systemach wskaŸników zrównowa¿onego rozwoju. W 2011 r. powo³ano, z inicjatywy Eurostatu oraz Francuskiego Narodowego Instytutu Badañ Statystycznych i Ekonomicznych (INSEE) Grupê Inicjatywn¹ ds. Pomiaru Postêpu, Dobrobytu i Zrównowa¿onego Rozwoju. Grupa ta zaproponowa³a zestaw wskaŸników s³u¿¹cych do pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia. Nad uszczegó³owieniem zaleceñ dotycz¹cych pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia oraz opracowaniem ostatecznej listy wskaŸników w tym obszarze pracuje aktualnie powo³ana przez Eurostat grupa ekspertów. W opracowaniu przedstawiona zosta³a koncepcja badania jakoœci ¿ycia w kontekœcie celów polityki spo³ecznej oraz narzêdzia umo¿liwiaj¹ce ten pomiar. Jakoœæ ¿ycia w kontekœcie polityki spo³ecznej zdefiniowana jest przy tym na gruncie teorii potrzeb, czyli uto¿samiana jest z poziomem zaspokojenia potrzeb spo³ecznych. W ocenie jakoœci ¿ycia zosta³ uwzglêdniony zarówno wymiar obiektywny jak i subiektywny jego pomiaru. Ponadto przedstawione zosta³y powi¹zania pojêcia jakoœci ¿ycia z integracj¹ spo³eczn¹ i zrównowa¿onym rozwojem. Zaproponowan¹ metodykê pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia zastosowano do jego pomiaru w Polsce w 2011 r. zarówno na poziomie ogólnokrajowym jak i na poziomie regionalnym (wojewódzkim). Dokonano tak¿e grupowania województw ze wzglêdu na podobieñstwo struktury jakoœci ¿ycia gospodarstw domowych zarówno wed³ug ujêcia obiektywnego jak i subiektywnego.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Panek, 2015. "Jakoœæ ¿ycia gospodarstw domowych w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim," Working Papers 76, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssl-kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KAE/struktura/ISiD/publikacje/Documents/Working_Paper/ISID_WP_46_2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2002. "What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 402-435, June.
    2. Azar, Ofer H., 2004. "What sustains social norms and how they evolve?: The case of tipping," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 49-64, May.
    3. M. K. Bennett, 1937. "On Measurement of Relative National Standards of Living," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 317-336.
    4. Felicia Huppert & Nic Marks & Andrew Clark & Johannes Siegrist & Alois Stutzer & Joar Vittersø & Morten Wahrendorf, 2009. "Measuring Well-being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and Preliminary Findings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 301-315, May.
    5. Easterlin, Richard A., 1974. "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence," MPRA Paper 111773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guilherme Kenji Chihaya, 2015. "The Effect of Being the Only Child on Friendship Nominations," Working Papers 77, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    2. Christopher Mackie & Conal Smith, 2015. "Conceptualizing Subjective Well-Being And Its Many Dimensions – Implications For Data Collection In Official Statistics And For Policy Relevance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 335-372, September.
    3. Marc Hooghe & Bram Vanhoutte, 2011. "Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities. The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 17-36, January.
    4. Gregor Gonza & Anže Burger, 2017. "Subjective Well-Being During the 2008 Economic Crisis: Identification of Mediating and Moderating Factors," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1763-1797, December.
    5. Mackie Christopher & Smith Conal, 2015. "Conceptualizing Subjective Well-Being and its Many Dimensions – Implications for Data Collection in Official Statistics and for Policy Relevance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 335-372, September.
    6. Conal Smith & Christopher Mackie, 2015. "Conceptualizing Subjective Well-Being and its Many Dimensions – Implications for Data Collection in Official Statistics and for Policy Relevance," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 16(3), pages 335-372, September.
    7. Fluhrer, Svenja & Kraehnert, Kati, 2022. "Sitting in the same boat: Subjective well-being and social comparison after an extreme weather event," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Senik, Claudia, 2009. "Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 408-424, October.
    9. Varvarigos, Dimitrios, 2011. "Non-monotonic welfare dynamics in a growing economy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 303-312, June.
    10. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7fst0pcf5j8cr99e1nuobt97rn is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Akay, Alpaslan & Martinsson, Peter, 2011. "Does relative income matter for the very poor? Evidence from rural Ethiopia," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 213-215, March.
    12. Che-Yuan Liang, 2017. "Optimal inequality behind the veil of ignorance," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 431-455, October.
    13. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2008. "The Concept Of Comparison Income: An Historical Perspective," MPRA Paper 8713, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bruno S. Frey & Anthony Gullo, 2021. "Does Sports Make People Happier, or Do Happy People More Sports?," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 22(4), pages 432-458, May.
    15. Bruno Frey, 2011. "Tullock challenges: happiness, revolutions, and democracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 269-281, September.
    16. Tsegay Gebrekidan Tekleselassie, 2017. "Subjective Wellbeing and Institutions: The Case of Rural Ethiopia," Working Papers 016, Policy Studies Institute.
    17. Conzo, Pierluigi & Aassve, Arnstein & Fuochi, Giulia & Mencarini, Letizia, 2017. "The cultural foundations of happiness," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 268-283.
    18. Drakopoulos, Stavros, 2011. "Hierarchical Needs, Income Comparisons and Happiness Levels," MPRA Paper 48343, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Noelia Somarriba Arechavala & Pilar Zarzosa Espina & Ana Teresa López Pastor, 2022. "The Importance of the Neighbourhood Environment and Social Capital for Happiness in a Vulnerable District: The Case of the Pajarillos District in Spain," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1941-1965, June.
    20. Stefano Bartolini & Francesco Sarracino, 2014. "It's not the economy, stupid! How social capital and GDP relate to happiness over time," Papers 1411.2138, arXiv.org.
    21. Hajdu, Tamás & Hajdu, Gábor, 2011. "A hasznosság és a relatív jövedelem kapcsolatának vizsgálata magyar adatok segítségével [Examining the relation of utility and relative income using Hungarian data]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 56-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    jakoœæ ¿ycia;

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Milena Borkowska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.