Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Eligibility and take up of social assistance for immigrants and nationals: the case of Luxembourg?

Contents:

Author Info

  • AMETEPE Kossi
  • HARTMANN HIRSCH Claudia
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Welfare states have developed within nation-states and were initially aimed at their own citizens. Migrants, however, are also included in Bismarckian insurances due to the link between work contract and insurances. With this in mind, then, what happens with non-contributory benefits such as social assistance? In this paper we tackle Luxembourg?s social assistance, the Revenu Minimum Garanti (RMG). The legal framework of this benefit contains a residence condition which excluded all migrants and still excludes non-EU migrants. By differentiating immigrants via their educational level and migration status (EU or non-EU) and nationals via their educational level (for both groups being more or less than a BA/BSc), we can demonstrate in a more contrastive way the ?eligibility? and the ?take-up? versus ?non-take-up? of the RMG by the different groups. Given Luxembourg?s strong highly qualified immigration, comparing just ?immigrants? with ?nationals?, presupposing hence two homogeneous groups, would not have been appropriate. We used one wave of the PSELL 3/EU-SILC household panel and discovered a relationship between eligibility and migration status only for the less qualified immigrants and nationals with a very high eligibility for non-EU migrants, but an extremely small eligibility for highly qualified nationals and migrants. According to the regression analysis of take-up, there is no significant difference between nationals and immigrants for the less qualified. Hence we conclude that there is little consumption by the most vulnerable.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ceps.lu/publi_viewer.cfm?tmp=1506
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by CEPS/INSTEAD in its series CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series with number 2010-05.

    as in new window
    Length: 33 pages
    Date of creation: Apr 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2010-05

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 3, avenue de la Fonte, L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, G.-D. Luxembourg
    Phone: 00352 / 58 58 55 - 1
    Fax: 00352 / 58 58 55 - 700
    Web page: http://www.ceps.lu
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Virginia Hernanz & Franck Malherbet & Michele Pellizzari, 2004. "Take-Up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD Publishing 17, OECD Publishing.
    2. Felix Büchel & Joachim R. Frick, 2004. "Immigrants in the UK and in West Germany –Relative income position, income portfolio, and redistribution effects," Journal of Population Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 553-581, 08.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. TOURBEAUX Jérôme, 2012. "L'intégration des Portugais du Luxembourg," CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series, CEPS/INSTEAD 2012-09, CEPS/INSTEAD.
    2. FLEURY Charles, 2010. "Les attitudes et les pratiques de solidarité intergénérationnelle des immigrants portugais du Luxembourg : une étude comparative," CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series, CEPS/INSTEAD 2010-24, CEPS/INSTEAD.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2010-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Begona Levices).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.