Is Emission Trading Beneficial?
AbstractWe develop a two-country (North and South), two-good, general equilibrium model of international trade in goods and explore the effects of domestic and international emission trading under free trade in goods. Whereas domestic emission trading in North may result in carbon leakage by expanding South’s production of the emission-intensive good, international emission trading may induce North to expand the production of the emission-intensive good by importing emission permits. Emission trading may deteriorate global environment. North’s (South’s) emission trading may not benefit South (North). International emission trading improves global efficiency but may not benefit both countries.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Center for Research on Contemporary Economic Systems, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University in its series CCES Discussion Paper Series with number 41.
Length: 21,  p.
Date of creation: Mar 2011
Date of revision:
global warming; emission quota; emission trading; carbon leakage; Kyoto Protocol;
Other versions of this item:
- Jota Ishikawa & Kazuharu Kiyono & Morihiro Yomogida, 2011. "Is Emission Trading Beneficial?," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd10-180, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
- ISHIKAWA Jota & KIYONO Kazuharu & YOMOGIDA Morihiro, 2011. "Is Emission Trading Beneficial?," Discussion papers 11006, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
- F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2011-04-02 (All new papers)
- NEP-ENE-2011-04-02 (Energy Economics)
- NEP-ENV-2011-04-02 (Environmental Economics)
- NEP-INT-2011-04-02 (International Trade)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Markusen, James R. & Morey, Edward R. & Olewiler, Nancy, 1995. "Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 55-77, January.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Should there be international trade in pollution rights?
by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2011-05-02 14:50:00
- Kazuharu Kiyono & Jota Ishikawa, 2011.
"Environmental Management Policy under International Carbon Leakage,"
Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series
gd11-204, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
- Kazuharu Kiyono & Jota Ishikawa, 2013. "Environmental Management Policy Under International Carbon Leakage," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 54, pages 1057-1083, 08.
- Kiyono, Kazuharu & Ishikawa, Jota, 2011. "Environmental Management Policy under International Carbon Leakage," CCES Discussion Paper Series 45, Center for Research on Contemporary Economic Systems, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.