IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2022_010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interview Scheduling: An Integer Programming Approach

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This article provides a general meeting scheduling model to schedule en-masse interviews over multi-day events. Creating such meeting schedules is a complicated, time-consuming task that usually requires considerable manual planning when hundreds of meetings are involved and if the quality of the schedule is a priority. The problem consists of three overlapping and gradually more difficult objectives — that is, at favorable times, to assign meetings, assign individual interviewers consecutive meetings, and assign interviewer pairs consecutive meetings. The model has been applied five times within a student organization, ranging from 17 to 1149 meetings to be scheduled. Compared to former, manually created schedules, both the organization’s and the interviewers’ perceived interviewing experience is markedly improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Braathen, Christian, 2022. "Interview Scheduling: An Integer Programming Approach," Discussion Papers 2022/10, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2022_010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2991902
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helmut E. Mausser & Michael J. Magazine & John B. Moore, 1996. "Application of an Annealed Neural Network to a Timetabling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 103-117, May.
    2. Yingping Huang & Xihui Zhang & Paulette S. Alexander, 2012. "A Heuristic Algorithm for Optimizing Business Matchmaking Scheduling," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 59-73, October.
    3. Lynn Gordon & Erhan Erkut, 2004. "Improving Volunteer Scheduling for the Edmonton Folk Festival," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 367-376, October.
    4. Leroy, Sophie, 2009. "Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 168-181, July.
    5. John J. Bartholdi & Kevin L. McCroan, 1990. "Scheduling Interviews for a Job Fair," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 951-960, December.
    6. Agnès Le Roux & Odile Bellenguez-Morineau & Christelle Guéret & Damien Prot, 2015. "Complexity of a one-to-one meeting scheduling problem with two types of actors," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(10), pages 1730-1741, October.
    7. A. T. Ernst & R. G. J. Mills & P. Welgama, 2003. "Scheduling Appointments at Trade Events for the Australian Tourist Commission," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 12-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K A Willoughby & C J Zappe, 2006. "A methodology to optimize foundation seminar assignments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 950-956, August.
    2. Vangerven, Bart & Ficker, Annette M.C. & Goossens, Dries R. & Passchyn, Ward & Spieksma, Frits C.R. & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2018. "Conference scheduling — A personalized approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 38-47.
    3. Ahmadian, Mohammad Mahdi & Khatami, Mostafa & Salehipour, Amir & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Four decades of research on the open-shop scheduling problem to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 399-426.
    4. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    5. Lu, Jackson G. & Akinola, Modupe & Mason, Malia F., 2017. "“Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 63-75.
    6. Sperling, Martina & Schryen, Guido, 2022. "Decision support for disaster relief: Coordinating spontaneous volunteers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 690-705.
    7. Gabriel Zayas‐Cabán & Emmett J. Lodree & David L. Kaufman, 2020. "Optimal Control of Parallel Queues for Managing Volunteer Convergence," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2268-2288, October.
    8. Andrew G. Clark & Susan Cholette & Ozgur Ozluk, 2011. "UCSF Increases Consumer Value Through Optimal Vendor-Show Scheduling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 327-337, August.
    9. Mauro Falasca & Christopher Zobel & Cliff Ragsdale, 2011. "Helping a Small Development Organization Manage Volunteers More Efficiently," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 254-262, June.
    10. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    11. Suvrat Dhanorkar & Enno Siemsen, 2021. "How Nudges Lead to Improved Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing: Evidence from Archival Data and a Field Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3735-3757, October.
    12. Siri Terjesen & Amy Willis, 2016. "Experimental economics and business education: an interview with Nobel Laureate Vernon Lomax Smith," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 261-275, June.
    13. Gneezy, Uri & Nelidov, Vadim & Offerman, Theo & van de Ven, Jeroen, 2023. "When opportunities backfire: Alternatives reduce perseverance and success in task completion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 304-324.
    14. Long, James H. & Basoglu, K. Asli, 2016. "The impact of task interruption on tax accountants' professional judgment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-113.
    15. Sayanti SHAW, 2018. "Role Of Need For Closure On Perceived Price Fairness," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 797-806, November.
    16. Rocio Bonet & Fabrizio Salvador, 2017. "When the Boss Is Away: Manager–Worker Separation and Worker Performance in a Multisite Software Maintenance Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 244-261, April.
    17. Mengyang Pan & Aravind Chandrasekaran & James Hill & Manus Rungtusanatham, 2022. "Multidisciplinary R&D project success in small firms: The role of multiproject status and project management experience," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2806-2821, July.
    18. Choi, Yunsik & Delise, Lisa A. & Lee, Brandon W. & Neely, Jerry, 2021. "Effective staffing of projects for reconciling conflict between cost efficiency and quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Chao Lu & Yingyi Zhang & Yong‐Yeol Ahn & Ying Ding & Chenwei Zhang & Dandan Ma, 2020. "Co‐contributorship network and division of labor in individual scientific collaborations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1162-1178, October.
    20. Paret, Kyle E. & Mayorga, Maria E. & Lodree, Emmett J., 2021. "Assigning spontaneous volunteers to relief efforts under uncertainty in task demand and volunteer availability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Meeting scheduling; assignment problems; optimization; integer programming; volunteer management; practice of OR;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2022_010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.