Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Institutional Quality, Trust and Stock Market Participation: Learning to Forget

Contents:

Author Info

  • Asgharian, Hossein

    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

  • Liu, Lu

    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

  • Lundtofte, Frederik

    ()
    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

Abstract

This paper explores the relation between institutional quality, trust and stock market participation. In our theoretical motivation, agents update their beliefs in a Bayesian manner based on their historical observations on frauds and they choose to invest in the stock market if their subjective probability of fraud is sufficiently low. In accordance with this theoretical motivation, we develop an empirical model, which tests the hypothesis that higher institutional quality is likely to lead to a higher level of trust, together with the hypothesis that when the level of trust is sufficiently high, agents choose to invest in the stock market. We use a large sample of European (SHARE survey) data on households residing in fourteen European countries that have a large variation in institutional quality. We find that institutional quality has a significant effect on trust and that trust (particularly the part that is explained by institutional quality) in turn significantly affects stock market participation. Moreover, our model takes into account the learning process of immigrants, who experience a dramatic change in institutional quality. We find that the probability that an immigrant participates in the stock market increases both with the institutional quality of the country of residence and that of the country of origin. However, on average, the former is more influential than the latter. We also find that immigrants with a higher level of education adapt their level of trust faster to the institutional environment of the country of residence than those with a lower level of education. The impact of the institutional quality of the immigrants’ country of residence on stock market participation, relative to that of their country of origin, tends to increase with education.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.lusem.lu.se/media/kwc/working-papers/2014/kwc-wp-2014-2.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Niclas Andrén) or (Frederik Lundtofte)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University in its series Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series with number 2014/2.

as in new window
Length: 53 pages
Date of creation: 10 Apr 2014
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhs:luwick:2014_002

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University School of Economics and Management, P.O. Box 7080, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Phone: +46 46-222 32 61
Fax: +46 46-222 34 06
Web page: http://www.lusem.lu.se/kwc
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: institutional quality; learning; trust; limited participation puzzle;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Allen, Franklin & Gale, Douglas, 1994. "Limited Market Participation and Volatility of Asset Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 933-55, September.
  2. Dimitris Georgarakos & Giacomo Pasini, 2011. "Trust, Sociability, and Stock Market Participation," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, European Finance Association, vol. 15(4), pages 693-725.
  3. Iris Bohnet & Steffen Huck, 2004. "Repetition and Reputation: Implications for Trust and Trustworthiness When Institutions Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 362-366, May.
  4. Jeffrey R. Brown & Zoran Ivkovich & Paul A. Smith & Scott Weisbenner, 2007. "Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation," NBER Working Papers 13168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  5. Goffe, William L. & Ferrier, Gary D. & Rogers, John, 1994. "Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 60(1-2), pages 65-99.
  6. Christelis, Dimitris & Georgarakos, Dimitris & Haliassos, Michalis, 2010. "Differences in Portfolios across Countries: Economic Environment versus Household Characteristics," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 8017, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  7. Francisco J. Gomes, 2005. "Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss-Averse Investors," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 675-706, March.
  8. Williamson, S.D., 1991. "Liquidity and Market Participation," University of Western Ontario, The Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations Working Papers, University of Western Ontario, The Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations 9110, University of Western Ontario, The Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations.
  9. H. Henry Cao & Tan Wang & Harold H. Zhang, 2005. "Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation, and Asset Prices," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1219-1251.
  10. Larry Epstein & Martin Schneider, 2002. "Learning Under Ambiguity," RCER Working Papers, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) 497, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER), revised Mar 2005.
  11. Ang, Andrew & Bekaert, Geert & Liu, Jun, 2005. "Why stocks may disappoint," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 471-508, June.
  12. Jeremy Verlinda, 2006. "A comparison of two common approaches for estimating marginal effects in binary choice models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 77-80.
  13. Guiso, Luigi & Sapienza, Paola & Zingales, Luigi, 2005. "Trusting the Stock Market," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 5288, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  14. Harrison Hong & Jeffrey D. Kubik & Jeremy C. Stein, 2001. "Social Interaction and Stock-Market Participation," NBER Working Papers 8358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  15. Dow, James & Werlang, Sergio Ribeiro da Costa, 1992. "Uncertainty Aversion, Risk Aversion, and the Optimal Choice of Portfolio," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 197-204, January.
  16. Hakansson, Nils H, 1971. "On Optimal Myopic Portfolio Policies, With and Without Serial Correlation of Yields," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(3), pages 324-34, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:luwick:2014_002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Niclas Andrén) or (Frederik Lundtofte).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.