IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-02514738.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bozio

    (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Simon Rabaté

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques, Centraal Planbureau)

  • Audrey Rain

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Maxime To

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques, UCL - University College of London [London], Institute for Fiscal Studies)

Abstract

Cette étude vise à simuler un système de retraite fonctionnant en points, dans l'optique de la réforme en préparation visant à l'instauration d'un régime universel en points. L'objectif de ce rapport est de se concentrer sur la définition des règles de pilotage du système. En particulier, quelles sont les règles d'or du système qui devraient faire l'objet d'engagements forts de la part du législateur pour garantir les droits de retraite ? Dans quelle mesure une partie du pilotage peut faire l'objet de décisions plus flexibles, au fil de l'eau ? La méthodologie de ce travail repose sur une analyse théorique et la simulation de chocs démographiques et économiques afin d'étudier les conséquences pour la soutenabilité du système et le niveau des pensions, de différentes règles de pilotage. Il s'agit de soumettre le système de retraite à des stress test, à l'instar des tests de résistance bancaire simulés par les banques centrales.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," Working Papers halshs-02514738, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02514738
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02514738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02514738/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Samuelson, 1958. "An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(6), pages 467-467.
    2. Schokkaert, Erik & Devolder, Pierre & Hindriks, Jean & Vandenbroucke, Frank, 2020. "Towards an equitable and sustainable points system. A proposal for pension reform in Belgium," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 49-79, January.
    3. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Post-Print halshs-02520841, HAL.
    4. Didier Blanchet & Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté, 2016. "Quelles options pour réduire la dépendance à la croissance du système de retraite français ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 67(4), pages 879-911.
    5. Auerbach, Alan J. & Lee, Ronald, 2011. "Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-2), pages 16-27, February.
    6. Sophie Buffeteau & Emmanuelle Crenner & Sylvie Le Minez & Didier Blanchet, 2011. "Le modèle de microsimulation Destinie 2 : principales caractéristiques et premiers résultats," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 441(1), pages 101-121.
    7. Didier Blanchet & Cécile Brousse & Mahrez Okba, 1996. "Retraite, préretraite, neutralité actuarielle et couverture du risque de chômage en fin de carrière," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 291(1), pages 203-218.
    8. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02520841, HAL.
    9. Yves Dubois & Anthony Marino, 2015. "Le taux de rendement interne du système de retraite français : quelle redistribution au sein d’une génération et quelle évolution entre générations ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 481(1), pages 77-95.
    10. Salvador Valdes‐Prieto, 2000. "The Financial Stability of Notional Account Pensions," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(3), pages 395-417, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baurin, Arno & Hindriks, Jean, 2023. "Intergenerational consequences of gradual pension reforms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alonso-García, J. & Devolder, P., 2016. "Optimal mix between pay-as-you-go and funding for DC pension schemes in an overlapping generations model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-236.
    2. Riccardo Magnani, 2016. "Is an Increase in the Minimum Retirement Age Always Desirable? The Case of Notional Defined Contribution Systems," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 578-602, July.
    3. Alonso-García, Jennifer & Devolder, Pierre, 2019. "Continuous time model for notional defined contribution pension schemes: Liquidity and solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-76.
    4. Mauro Visaggio, 2019. "Extending the retirement age for preserving the costitutive pension system mission," Public Finance Research Papers 40, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    5. Carlos Vidal-Meliá & Inmaculada Domínguez-Fabian, 2005. "The Spanish Pension System: Issues Of Introducing Notional Defined Contribution Accounts," Public Economics 0504006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2019. "How should a points pension system be managed?," Post-Print halshs-02516413, HAL.
    7. Andras Simonovits, 2020. "Indexing public pensions in progress to wages or prices," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2015, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Baurin, Arno & Hindriks, Jean, 2023. "Intergenerational consequences of gradual pension reforms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    10. Palmer, Edward, 2011. "Generic NDC - Equilibrium, Valuation and Risk Sharing with and without NDC Bonds," Working Paper Series 2011:3, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    11. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02520841, HAL.
    12. Christina Benita Wilke, 2008. "On the feasibility of notional defined contribution systems: The German case," MEA discussion paper series 08165, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    13. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    14. Carlos Vidal-Meliá & Manuel Ventura-Marco & Juan Manuel Pérez-Salamero González, 2018. "Social Insurance Accounting for a Notional Defined Contribution Scheme Combining Retirement and Long-Term Care Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-36, August.
    15. András Simonovits, 2020. "Indexing Public Pensions in Progress to Wages or Prices," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 12(2), pages 171-194, June.
    16. Róbert I Gál & Vera Gergely & Márton Medgyesi, 2011. "National Transfer Accounts in Hungary: contribution asset and returns in a pay-as-you-go pension," Chapters, in: Ronald Lee & Andrew Mason (ed.), Population Aging and the Generational Economy, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. George Economides & Hyun Park & Apostolis Philippopoulos & Stelios Sakkas, 2015. "On the Composition of Public Spending and Taxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 5510, CESifo.
    18. Riccardo Magnani, 2018. "What's gone wrong in the design of PAYG systems?," CEPN Working Papers 2018-13, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    19. Zoutieding, Tieding, 2018. "生育率波动与土地流失对城郊家庭养老的侵蚀性影响 [The Erosion Effect of the Fertility Fluctuation and Soil Erosion on Elderly Supporting of Suburban Families]," MPRA Paper 101626, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Dec 2018.
    20. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2019. "How should a points pension system be managed?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02516413, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02514738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.