IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02024739.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The influence of threatening visual warnings on tobacco packaging: Measuring the impact of threat level, image size, and type of pack through psychophysiological and self-report methods

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Droulers

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Karine Gallopel-Morvan

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP], IDM - Institut du Management - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP])

  • Sophie Lacoste-Badie

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mathieu Lajante

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The first aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness, in terms of emotional and behavioral reactions, of moderately vs. highly TVWs (Threatening Visual Warnings) displayed on tobacco packs. Given the key role that emotional reactions play in explaining the effect of TVWs on behaviors, psychophysiological and self-report methods were used–for the first time in this context–to measure the emotions provoked by TVWs. The second aim of this research was to determine whether increasing the size of warnings, and their display on plain packaging (compared with branded packaging) would improve their effectiveness.A within-subjects experiment was conducted. Three variables were manipulated: health warning threat level (high vs. moderate), image size (40% vs. 75%) and pack type (plain vs. branded). A convenience sample of 48 French daily smokers participated. They were exposed to eight different packs of cigarettes in a research lab at the University of Rennes. Smokers' emotions and behavioral intentions were recorded through self-reports. Emotions were also evaluated using psychophysiological measurements: electrodermal activity and facial electromyography. The results revealed that TVWs with a high threat level are the most effective in increasing negative emotions (fear, disgust, valence, arousal) and behavioral intentions conducive to public health (desire to quit, etc.). They also highlight the appeal of increasing the size of the warnings and displaying them on plain packs, because this influences emotions, which is the first step toward behavioral change.Increasing the threat level of TVWs from moderate to high seems beneficial for public health. Our results also confirm the relevance of recent governmental decisions to adopt plain packaging and larger TVWs (in the UK, France, Ireland, Canada, New Zealand, Hungary, etc.).

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Droulers & Karine Gallopel-Morvan & Sophie Lacoste-Badie & Mathieu Lajante, 2017. "The influence of threatening visual warnings on tobacco packaging: Measuring the impact of threat level, image size, and type of pack through psychophysiological and self-report methods," Post-Print halshs-02024739, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02024739
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184415
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02024739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02024739/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0184415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monárrez-Espino, J. & Liu, B. & Greiner, F. & Bremberg, S. & Galanti, R., 2014. "Systematic review of the effect of pictorial warnings on cigarette packages in smoking behavior," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(10), pages 11-30.
    2. Mathieu Lajante & Olivier Droulers & Thibaut Dondaine & David Amarantini, 2012. "Opening the « black box » of electrodermal activity in consumer neuroscience research," Post-Print halshs-01109418, HAL.
    3. Gallopel-Morvan, Karine & Gabriel, Patrick & Le Gall-Ely, Marine & Rieunier, Sophie & Urien, Bertrand, 2011. "The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 7-11, January.
    4. Abigail T Evans & Ellen Peters & Andrew A Strasser & Lydia F Emery & Kaitlin M Sheerin & Daniel Romer, 2015. "Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. McCool, Judith & Webb, Lisa & Cameron, Linda D. & Hoek, Janet, 2012. "Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1269-1273.
    6. Mathieu Lajante & Olivier Droulers & David Amarantini, 2017. "How Reliable Are “State-of-the-Art” Facial EMG Processing Methods?," Post-Print halshs-01935695, HAL.
    7. Karine Gallopel & Patrick Gabriel & Marine Le Gall-Ely & Sophie Rieunier & Bertrand Urien, 2011. "The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco," Post-Print halshs-00601101, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi Hong Leung, 2019. "Is usage of visual images in online marketing effective?," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(6), pages 147-156, June.
    2. Lafrenière, Darquise & Hurlimann, Thierry & Menuz, Vincent & Godard, Béatrice, 2014. "Evaluation of a cartoon-based knowledge dissemination intervention on scientific and ethical challenges raised by nutrigenomics/nutrigenetics research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-114.
    3. Tessitore, Tina & Geuens, Maggie, 2019. "Arming consumers against product placement: A comparison of factual and evaluative educational interventions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-48.
    4. Yi-Fen Chen & Shi-Han Chang, 2016. "The online framing effect: the moderating role of warning, brand familiarity, and product type," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 355-374, September.
    5. Rizal Edy Halim, 2019. "Warning Label Placement: The Difference Effect of Social Risk and Health Risk Consequences," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 282-297.
    6. Senyuz, Aysu & Hasford, Jonathan, 2022. "The allure of arrogance: How relationship formation motives enhance consumer preferences for arrogant communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 106-120.
    7. Béatrice Parguel & Renaud Lunardo & Jean-Charles Chebat, 2012. "Warning Young Adults Against Tobacco Consumption Through Ad Parodies: its Effects on Cigarette Brands Attitude," Post-Print halshs-00704000, HAL.
    8. Marie-Laure Mourre & Patricia Gurviez, 2015. "Proposition d’un modèle intégrateur de la résistance aux messages anti-tabac," Post-Print hal-01443801, HAL.
    9. Davis, Cassandra Denise & Burton, Scot, 2019. "Making bad look good: The counterpersuasive effects of natural labels on (dangerous) vice goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 271-282.
    10. Septianto, Felix & Lee, Michael S.W., 2020. "Emotional responses to plastic waste: Matching image and message framing in encouraging consumers to reduce plastic consumption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 18-29.
    11. Ghosh, Tathagata & Sreejesh, S. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Brand logos versus brand names: A comparison of the memory effects of textual and pictorial brand elements placed in computer games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 222-235.
    12. Dong Jenn Yang, 2018. "Exploring the communication effects of message framing of smoking cessation advertising on smokers’ mental processes," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 315-332, September.
    13. Wang, Wangshuai & Yi, Yanxi & Li, Jie & Sun, Gong & Zhang, Mo, 2022. "Lighting up the dark: How the scarcity of childhood resources leads to preferences for bright stimuli," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1155-1164.
    14. Kauronen Marja-Leena & Lehtonen Olli & Purhonen Kirsi & Kallunki Valdemar & Polak Angelika, 2020. "Picture-Based Recognition of Smokers: A Novel Visual Method," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 24(4), pages 34-49, December.
    15. Lajante, Mathieu & Ladhari, Riadh, 2019. "The promise and perils of the peripheral psychophysiology of emotion in retailing and consumer services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 305-313.
    16. Eman Wadie Abdel Halim, 2020. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Negative Appeals Used in Emotional Marketing in Relation to Smoking Phenomenon in Egypt," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 160-160, March.
    17. Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2023. "Information Nudges and Self-Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2182-2197, April.
    18. Trinidad Beleche & Nellie Lew & Rosemarie L. Summers & J. Laron Kirby, 2018. "Are Graphic Warning Labels Stopping Millions of Smokers? A Comment on Huang, Chaloupka, and Fong," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 15(2), pages 129–157-1, May.
    19. Lim, Weng Marc, 2018. "Demystifying neuromarketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 205-220.
    20. Kuehnle, Daniel, 2019. "How effective are pictorial warnings on tobacco products? New evidence on smoking behaviour using Australian panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electrophysiology; Fear; Smoking habits; Emotions; Face; Behavior; Public and occupational health; Electromyography;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02024739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.