IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00462660.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fondements critiques pour une analyse de la dynamique industrielle: la méthode de Allyn Young

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques-Laurent Ravix

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

[fre] Fondements critiques pour une analyse de la dynamique industrielle. La méthode de Allyn Young. . Cet article propose une mise en perspective du texte de Allyn Young, « Increasing Returns and Economic Progress » [1928], à partir des conceptions méthodologiques développées par ce même auteur dans d'autres contributions, pour certaines récemment éditées. Sa vision du progrès des connaissances économiques, fondée sur une forme de rationalisme critique, permet de montrer pour­quoi l'article de 1928 offre une analyse originale de la dynamique industrielle. Cette analyse résulte d'une double critique des contextes théoriques smithien et marshallien dans lesquels l'auteur situe son approche du développement écono­mique. Cette lecture est ensuite confrontée aux interprétations récentes de l'apport de Young à l'étude des systèmes d'économie industrielle. [eng] Critical foundations for industrial dynamics : Allyn Young's method. . This paper is a reappraisal of Allyn Young's well-known article « Increasing Returns and Economic Progress » [1928) in the context of his methodological writings, some of them being made recently available. His vision of the growth of knowledge in economics, based on critical rationalism, is confronted to his 1928 paper. We argue that Young's own theory of industrial dynamics is the result of a critical appraisal of both the Marshallian and the Smithian contexts it belongs to. This argument is compared to recent interpretations of Young's contribution to industrial economics.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 1997. "Fondements critiques pour une analyse de la dynamique industrielle: la méthode de Allyn Young," Post-Print halshs-00462660, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Gavin C. Reid, 1987. "Disequilibrium and Increasing Returns in Adam Smith's Analysis of Growth and Accumulation," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 87-106, Spring.
    3. Laurent Thévenot, 1989. "Équilibre et rationalité dans un univers complexe," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 147-198.
    4. R. H. Coase, 1972. "Industrial Organization: A Proposal for Research," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Volume 3, Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, pages 59-73, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Brian J. Loasby, 1989. "The Mind and Method of the Economist," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 288.
    6. Michel Quéré & Jacques-Laurent Ravix & Joël-Thomas Ravix & P.M. Romani, 1997. "Frontières de la firme, division institutionnelle du travail et processus de concurrence, in Garrouste P. (sld)," Post-Print halshs-00464584, HAL.
    7. Joël-Thomas Ravix, 1992. "Division du travail, échange et production: retour à Smith et Turgot," Post-Print halshs-00469061, HAL.
    8. Robert Boyer & Geneviève Schmeder, 1990. "Division du travail, changement technique et croissance. Un retour à Adam Smith," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 5(1), pages 125-194.
    9. Edward H. Chamberlin, 1961. "The Origin and Early Development of Monopolistic Competition Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(4), pages 515-543.
    10. J. de Bandt & J-L. Ravix & P.M. Romani, 1990. "Allyn Young: une approche de la dynamique industrielle," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 5(2), pages 111-138.
    11. F. H. Knight, 1924. "Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 38(4), pages 582-606.
    12. Leibenstein, Harvey, 1979. "A Branch of Economics is Missing: Micro-Micro Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 477-502, June.
    13. Roger J. Sandilands, 1990. "Nicholas Kaldor’s Notes on Allyn Young’s LSE Lectures 1927-29," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 17(3/4), December.
    14. Kaldor, Nicholas, 1972. "The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1237-1255, December.
    15. Charles P. Blitch, 1983. "Allyn Young on Increasing Returns," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 359-372, March.
    16. Edward S. Mason, 1982. "The Harvard Department of Economics from the Beginning to World War II," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(3), pages 383-433.
    17. Richard Arena, 1990. "La dynamique industrielle : tradition et renouveau," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 53(1), pages 5-17.
    18. Hahn, F H, 1989. "Kaldor on Growth," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 47-57, March.
    19. Hicks, John, 1989. "The Assumption of Constant Returns to Scale," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 9-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krafft, Jackie, 2004. "Frontières de la firme et de l’industrie : Les perspectives récentes issues de la rencontre entre l’histoire industrielle et l’économie industrielle," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(1), pages 109-135, Mars.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avi Cohen, 2006. "The Kaldor/Knight controversy: Is capital a distinct and quantifiable factor of production?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 141-161.
    2. Ramesh Chandra & Roger Sandilands, 2006. "The role of pecuniary external economies and economies of scale in the theory of increasing returns," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 193-208.
    3. Rosolino A. Candela, 2022. "The Division of Labor and Knowledge is Limited by the Division of Ownership Over the Ultimate Resource: The Role of Economies of Scope in Julian Simon," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 323-341, September.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4cufqrm9749dbol0m0bsfeopka is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Andrew Mearman, 2006. "Critical realism in economics and open-systems ontology: A critique," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 47-75.
    6. Bryan K. Ritchie, 2004. "Politics and Economic Reform in Malaysia," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2004-655, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    7. Christos N. Pitelis, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Bryan K. Ritchie, 2010. "Systemic Vulnerability and Sustainable Economic Growth," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13731.
    9. Xavier Ragot, 2003. "Croissance et division du travail," Post-Print hal-03475968, HAL.
    10. Paul Krugman, 1989. "History Vs. Expectations," NBER Working Papers 2971, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra, 2020. "Role of External and Domestic Demand in Economic Growth: A Study of BRICS Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 547-566, April.
    12. Giulio Guarini & Vasco Molini & Roberta Rabellotti, 2006. "Is Korea Catching Up? An Analysis of the Labour Productivity Growth in South Korea," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 323-339.
    13. Frédéric Lordon, 1991. "Théorie de la croissance : quelques développements récents [Deuxième partie : la redécouverte des rendements croissants]," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(1), pages 191-243.
    14. Pascal Petit & Luc Soete, 2002. "Is a Biased Technological Change Fuelling Dualism?," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Cerin, Pontus, 2006. "Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-225, February.
    16. Signorino, Rodolfo, 2012. "Edward H. Chamberlin (1899 − 1967)," MPRA Paper 39213, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Cristiano Antonelli & Pier Paolo Patrucco & Francesco Quatraro, 2008. "The governance of localized knowledge externalities," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 479-498.
    18. Joseph T. Mahoney & Anita M. McGahan & Christos N. Pitelis, 2009. "Perspective ---The Interdependence of Private and Public Interests," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    19. Lacoude Philippe, 1995. "Une Critique des Theories de la Croissance Endogene," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 1-40, December.
    20. C J Krizan, 1997. "An Applied General Equilibrium Model Of Moroccan Trade Liberalization Featuring External Economies," Working Papers 97-16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    21. Xavier Ragot, 2003. "Croissance et division du travail," Post-Print hal-03475968, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    analyse; dynamique industrielle;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.