IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03540158.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Community benefits of fair trade: the value of a survey on the intention to remain living on its territory among young people
[Bénéfices communautaires du commerce équitable : intérêt d’une enquête sur l’intention de rester vivre sur son territoire chez les jeunes]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Pernin

    (LERASS - Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Ivan Dufeu

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Raoul Djamen

Abstract

L'objectif de cette communication est de proposer un outil de mesure des bénéfices du commerce équitable (CE) auprès des populations locales à l'aide d'une enquête sur l'intention de rester vivre sur son territoire chez les jeunes. Le modèle théorique utilisé est celui de la théorie du comportement planifié (TCP) augmentée de l'attachement au territoire et des regrets anticipés. Dans un premier temps, une enquête qualitative a été menée auprès de 20 jeunes camerounais sur une zone rurale peu favorisée. Une enquête quantitative a ensuite été réalisée auprès de jeunes français (n= 353) afin de valider le modèle ; ceci après une adaptation du questionnaire au contexte français. Les analyses factorielles confirmatoires montrent une très bonne qualité d'ajustement du modèle. Les équations structurelles permettent, au final, de valider le modèle sauf sur la perception de contrôle sur le comportement et les normes descriptives. L'attachement au territoire et les regrets anticipés prennent une place significative dans l'explication de l'intention. Nous concluons sur des pistes de recherches et des solutions visant à mesurer de façon plus systématique les bénéfices communautaires du CE et de projets de revitalisation des zones rurales en général, à les optimiser et à permettre une meilleure participation citoyenne au nord comme au sud.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Pernin & Ivan Dufeu & Raoul Djamen, 2017. "Community benefits of fair trade: the value of a survey on the intention to remain living on its territory among young people [Bénéfices communautaires du commerce équitable : intérêt d’une enquête," Post-Print hal-03540158, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03540158
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03540158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03540158/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pernin, Jean-Louis & Petitprêtre, Benoît, 2013. "L’intention d’achat de produits biologiques régionaux : une recherche exploratoire sur la base de la théorie du comportement planifié," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 94(3).
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Ronan Le Velly, 2009. "Quel commerce équitable pour quel développement durable ?," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 99-113.
    4. Pernin, Jean-Louis & Petitprêtre, Benoît, 2013. "L’intention d’achat de produits biologiques régionaux : une recherche exploratoire sur la base de la théorie du comportement planifié," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2013(03), pages 317-338, September.
    5. Pernin, Jean-Louis & Petitprêtre, Benoît, 2013. "L’intention d’achat de produits biologiques régionaux : une recherche exploratoire sur la base de la théorie du comportement planifié," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 94(03), pages 317-338, September.
    6. Jean-Louis Pernin & Benoît Petitprêtre, 2013. "L’intention d’achat de produits biologiques régionaux : une recherche exploratoire sur la base de la théorie du comportement planifié," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 94(3), pages 317-338.
    7. Karla Utting, 2009. "Assessing the Impact of Fair Trade Coffee: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 127-149, April.
    8. Allison Loconto & Emmanuel Simbua, 2012. "Making Room for Smallholder Cooperatives in Tanzanian Tea Production: Can Fairtrade Do That?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 451-465, July.
    9. Jean-Louis Pernin & Benoît Petitprêtre, 2013. "L’intention d’achat de produits biologiques régionaux : une recherche exploratoire sur la base de la théorie du comportement planifié," Post-Print hal-01986382, HAL.
    10. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    11. van der Pligt, J. & Zeelenberg, M. & van Dijk, W.W. & de Vries, N.K. & Richard, R., 1998. "Affect, attitudes and decisions : Let's be more specific," Other publications TiSEM 642e32ad-0be8-4201-b627-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yun-Chin Paya Hsu & Fiona Chan, 2015. "Surveying Data on Consumer Green Purchasing Intention: A Case in New Zealand," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    3. Frommeyer, Britta & Wagner, Elisa & Hossiep, C. Richard & Schewe, Gerhard, 2022. "The utility of intention as a proxy for sustainable buying behavior – A necessary condition analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 201-213.
    4. von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & von der Wense, Vera & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Characterising convinced sustainable food consumers," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 161887, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    5. Panico, Teresa & Verneau, Fabio & Capone, Vincenza & La Barbera, Francesco & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2017. "Antecedents of Intention and Behavior Towards Fair Trade Products: A Study on Values and Attitudes in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    6. Ulf Liebe & Veronika A. Andorfer & Patricia A. Gwartney & Jürgen Meyerhoff, 2014. "Ethical Consumption and Social Context: Experimental Evidence from Germany and the United States," University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 7, University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences.
    7. Cordula Hinkes & Inken Christoph-Schulz, 2020. "No Palm Oil or Certified Sustainable Palm Oil? Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Role of Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Yeji Shin & Seoyong Kim & Sohee Kim, 2022. "Searching for New Human Behavior Model in the Climate Change Age: Analyzing the Impact of Risk Perception and Government Factors on Intention–Action Consistency in Particulate Matter Mitigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Jean-Louis Pernin & Andréas Eriksson, 2016. "The compared assessment of two fair trade innovations: what contribution of the Perceived Value in co-branding models? [Evaluation comparée de deux innovations dans le commerce équitable : quel app," Post-Print hal-03540166, HAL.
    10. Veronika A. Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2014. "Do Information, Price, or Morals Influence Ethical Consumption? A Natural Field Experiment and Customer Survey on the Purchase of Fair Trade Coffee," University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 6, University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences.
    11. Volker Lingnau & Florian Fuchs & Florian Beham, 2019. "The impact of sustainability in coffee production on consumers’ willingness to pay–new evidence from the field of ethical consumption," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 65-93, April.
    12. Rhodes, Ryan E. & Beauchamp, Mark R. & Conner, Mark & deBruijn, Gert-Jan & Latimer-Cheung, Amy & Kaushal, Navin, 2014. "Are mere instructions enough? Evaluation of four types of messaging on community depot recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    14. Fernández Jardón, Carlos Mª, 2018. "Motivaciones de compra en consumidores de productos de comercio justo/Motivations of Purchase in Consumers of Fair Trade Products," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 579-602, Mayo.
    15. Yun-Chin Paya Hsu & Fiona Chan, 2015. "Surveying Data on Consumer Green Purchasing Intention: A Case in New Zealand," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Louise M. Hassan & Edward Shiu & Deirdre Shaw, 2016. "Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 219-236, June.
    17. William Sun, 2020. "Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: re-extending the theory of planned behavior," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 260-278, December.
    18. Jean-Louis Pernin & Didier Tagbata & Andréas Eriksson, 2017. "From attitude to fair product purchasing behaviour: what are the contributions of peripheral attitudes and behaviours? [De l’attitude au comportement d’achat de produits équitables : quels apports ," Post-Print hal-03540156, HAL.
    19. Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2016. "Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2697-2710.
    20. A. Leeuw & Pierre Valois & Alexandre Morin & Peter Schmidt, 2014. "Gender Differences in Psychosocial Determinants of University Students’ Intentions to Buy Fair Trade Products," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 485-505, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03540158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.