IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03540166.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The compared assessment of two fair trade innovations: what contribution of the Perceived Value in co-branding models?
[Evaluation comparée de deux innovations dans le commerce équitable : quel apport du concept de valeur perçue dans les modèles de cobranding ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Pernin

    (LERASS - Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Andréas Eriksson

    (LERASS - Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Pernin & Andréas Eriksson, 2016. "The compared assessment of two fair trade innovations: what contribution of the Perceived Value in co-branding models? [Evaluation comparée de deux innovations dans le commerce équitable : quel app," Post-Print hal-03540166, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03540166
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03540166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03540166/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Pelsmacker & Wim Janssens, 2007. "A Model for Fair Trade Buying Behaviour: The Role of Perceived Quantity and Quality of Information and of Product-specific Attitudes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 361-380, November.
    2. Emmanuelle Rosa & Eric Tafani & Géraldine Michel & Jean-Claude Abric, 2011. ""Rôle du processus de catégorisation dans le fonctionnement des représentations sociales : une application dans le champ du marketing?," Post-Print hal-01796255, HAL.
    3. Jean-Louis Pernin & Benoît Petitprêtre, 2012. "Commerce équitable et scepticisme: une typologie des consommateurs," Post-Print hal-02422622, HAL.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Nathalie Fleck & Pascale Quester, 2007. "Birds of a feather flock together…definition, role and measure of congruence: An application to sponsorship," Post-Print hal-02291877, HAL.
    6. Heckler, Susan E & Childers, Terry L, 1992. "The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, March.
    7. Abratt, Russell & Motlana, Patience, 2002. "Managing co-branding strategies: Global brands into local markets," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 43-50.
    8. Ahn, SooKyoung & Kim, HeaJung & Forney, Judith A., 2009. "Co-marketing alliances between heterogeneous industries: Examining perceived match-up effects in product, brand and alliance levels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 477-485.
    9. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    10. Philippe Aurier & Yves Evrard & Gilles N'Goala, 2004. "Comprendre et mesurer la valeur du point de vue du consommateur," Post-Print hal-02023028, HAL.
    11. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    12. Jean-Jack Cegarra & Géraldine Michel, 2001. "Co-branding: clarification du concept," Post-Print hal-02019188, HAL.
    13. Sylvain Sénéchal & Laurent Georges & Jean Pernin, 2014. "Alliances Between Corporate and Fair Trade Brands: Examining the Antecedents of Overall Evaluation of the Co-branded Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-381, October.
    14. Arnaud Riviere & Rémi Mencarelli, 2012. "Vers une clarification théorique de la notion de valeur perçue en marketing," Post-Print hal-02055377, HAL.
    15. Vermeir, Iris & Verbeke, Wim, 2008. "Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 542-553, January.
    16. J.-J. Cegarra & Dwight Merunka, 1993. "Les extensions de marque : Concepts et modèles," Post-Print hal-02015229, HAL.
    17. Shirley Leitch & Sally Davenport, 2007. "Corporate Brands and Social Brands: Co-Branding GM-Free and UK Supermarkets," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 45-63, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Louis Pernin & Didier Tagbata & Andréas Eriksson, 2017. "From attitude to fair product purchasing behaviour: what are the contributions of peripheral attitudes and behaviours? [De l’attitude au comportement d’achat de produits équitables : quels apports ," Post-Print hal-03540156, HAL.
    2. Sylvain Sénéchal & Laurent Georges & Jean Pernin, 2014. "Alliances Between Corporate and Fair Trade Brands: Examining the Antecedents of Overall Evaluation of the Co-branded Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-381, October.
    3. Christophe Bezes, 2010. "Tout ce qui est congruent, est-il similaire ? Propositions de définition du concept de congruence en marketing," Post-Print hal-00573441, HAL.
    4. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    5. Frommeyer, Britta & Wagner, Elisa & Hossiep, C. Richard & Schewe, Gerhard, 2022. "The utility of intention as a proxy for sustainable buying behavior – A necessary condition analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 201-213.
    6. von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & von der Wense, Vera & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Characterising convinced sustainable food consumers," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 161887, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    7. Empen, Lena & Schulze, Birgit, 2014. "Analyse Des Einstellungs-Verhaltens-Zusammenhangs Bei Fair Gehandelter Schokolade," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187323, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Catherine Janssen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2015. "Theoretical Lenses for Understanding the CSR–Consumer Paradox," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 775-787, September.
    9. Panico, Teresa & Verneau, Fabio & Capone, Vincenza & La Barbera, Francesco & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2017. "Antecedents of Intention and Behavior Towards Fair Trade Products: A Study on Values and Attitudes in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    10. Cordula Hinkes & Inken Christoph-Schulz, 2020. "No Palm Oil or Certified Sustainable Palm Oil? Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Role of Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Shan, Juan & Lu, Hebo & Cui, Annie Peng, 2022. "1 + 1 > 2? Is co-branding an effective way to improve brand masstige?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 556-571.
    12. Veronika A. Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2014. "Do Information, Price, or Morals Influence Ethical Consumption? A Natural Field Experiment and Customer Survey on the Purchase of Fair Trade Coffee," University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 6, University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences.
    13. Carrington, Michal J. & Neville, Benjamin A. & Whitwell, Gregory J., 2014. "Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2759-2767.
    14. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    15. Empen, L. & Schulze-Ehlers, B., 2015. "Analyse des Einstellungs-Verhaltens-Zusammenhangs bei fair gehandelter Schokolade," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    16. Sue Hornibrook & Claire May & Andrew Fearne, 2015. "Sustainable Development and the Consumer: Exploring the Role of Carbon Labelling in Retail Supply Chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 266-276, May.
    17. William Sun, 2020. "Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: re-extending the theory of planned behavior," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 260-278, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4283 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Carolin Decker & Annika Baade, 2016. "Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 648-665, November.
    20. Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2016. "Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2697-2710.
    21. Christophe Bezes & Maria Mercanti-Guérin, 2017. "Similarity in marketing: Scope, measurement, and fields of application [La similarité en marketing : périmètre, mesure et champs d'application]," Post-Print hal-02086666, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03540166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.