IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03197914.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Confinement et comportements alimentaires : Quelles évolutions en matière d'alimentation durable ?

Author

Listed:
  • Agnès François-Lecompte

    (UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud)

  • Morgane Innocent

    (UBO UFR DSE - Université de Bretagne Occidentale - UFR Droit et sciences économiques - UBO - Université de Brest)

  • Dominique Kréziak

    (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Isabelle Prim-Allaz

    (UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnès François-Lecompte & Morgane Innocent & Dominique Kréziak & Isabelle Prim-Allaz, 2020. "Confinement et comportements alimentaires : Quelles évolutions en matière d'alimentation durable ?," Post-Print hal-03197914, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03197914
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03197914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03197914/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Coutelle-Brillet & Véronique Des Garets & Laurent Maubisson, 2016. "L’appropriation d’une innovation thérapeutique dans le cadre d’une maladie chronique : enjeux individuels et organisationnels," Post-Print hal-02490470, HAL.
    2. Morgane Innocent & Agnès François-Lecompte & Ronan Divard, 2019. "Comment aborder les enjeux de l’alimentation dans la transition écologique : le concept d’alimentation durable," Post-Print hal-02316289, HAL.
    3. Zanoli, Raffaele & Naspetti, Simona, 2002. "Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food. A means-end approach," MPRA Paper 32712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Ulusoy, Ebru, 2016. "Experiential responsible consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 284-297.
    5. Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Sonia Venanzi, 2018. "Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Isabelle Frochot & Dominique Kreziak & Elliot Statia, 2019. "Home away from home: A longitudinal study of the holiday appropriation process," Post-Print halshs-01957554, HAL.
    7. Patricia Coutelle & Véronique Des Garets & Laurent Maubisson & Arnaud Riviere, 2016. "L’appropriation d’une innovation thérapeutique dans le cadre d’une maladie chronique : enjeux individuels et organisationnels," Post-Print hal-01559136, HAL.
    8. Margot Dyen & Guillaume Le Borgne & Lucie Sirieix, 2020. "Comment le confinement peut durablement transformer nos pratiques alimentaires," Post-Print hal-02908786, HAL.
    9. Klaus G. Grunert, 2005. "Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(3), pages 369-391, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnès François-Lecompte & Morgane Innocent & Dominique Kreziak & Isabelle Prim-Allaz, 2020. "Confinement and food-related behaviors: What are the changes in sustainable food consumption? [Confinement et comportements alimentaires : Quelles évolutions en matière d’alimentation durable ?]," Post-Print hal-03123334, HAL.
    2. Iliriana Miftari & Rainer Haas & Oliver Meixner & Drini Imami & Ekrem Gjokaj, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumer Attitudes towards Organic Food Products in a Transition Economy—Insights from Kosovo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Post-Print hal-00656485, HAL.
    4. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoit-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 85-104, March.
    5. Caracciolo, Francesco & Cembalo, Luigi & Cicia, Giovanni & Del Giudice, Teresa & Grunert, Klaus G. & Krystallis, Athanasios, 2011. "Food safety and quality, strategic levers for European products in emerging markets: the case of China," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114321, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Ki-Hueng Kim & Kwan-Ryul Lee, 2019. "What Are South Korean Consumers’ Concerns When Buying Eco-Friendly Agricultural Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Gaviglio, Anna & Demartini, Eugenio & Pirani, Alberto & Marescotti, Maria Elena & Bertocchi, Mattia, 2015. "National Brands versus Private Labels versus Niche Products: a graphical representation of consumers' perception," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202731, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Marcia Barcellos & Klaus Grunert & Yanfeng Zhou & Wim Verbeke & F. Perez-Cueto & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Consumer attitudes to different pig production systems: a study from mainland China," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(3), pages 443-455, September.
    9. Ramo Barrena & Mercedes Sánchez, 2010. "Differences in Consumer Abstraction Levels as a Function of Risk Perception," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 34-59, February.
    10. Evrim ERDOĞAN YAZAR & Murat BURUCUOĞLU, 2019. "Consumer Attitude towards Organic Foods: A Multigroup Analysis across Genders," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 176-196, November.
    11. Del Giudice, Teresa & Caracciolo, Francesco & Cicia, Gianni & Grunert, Klaus G. & Krystallis, Athanasios & Zhou, Yanfeng, 2012. "New Trends in Chinese Diet: Cultural Influences on Consumer Behavior," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144962, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Tingqiang Chen & Lei Wang & Jining Wang & Qi Yang, 2017. "A Network Diffusion Model of Food Safety Scare Behavior considering Information Transparency," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, December.
    13. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Admassu, Samuel A., 2009. "Assessing consumer preferences for quality and safety attributes of food in the absence of official standards: the case of beef in Ethiopia," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50120, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Hattori, Keisuke & Higashida, Keisaku, 2014. "Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Vehapi Semir, 2015. "A Study of the Consumer Motives which Influence the Purchase of Organic Food in Serbia," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 53(1), pages 102-118, March.
    16. Meyer, Christian H. & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2010. "Customer Communication of Regional Quality Efforts: A Case From the Grain Sector," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100595, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    17. Curzi, Daniele & Raimondi, Valentina & Olper, Alessandro, 2013. "Quality Upgrading, Competition and Trade Policy: Evidence from the Agri-Food Sector," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152386, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    18. Karen Thome & Birgit Meade & Stacey Rosen & John C. Beghin, 2016. "Assessing Food Security in Ethiopia with USDA ERS's New Food Security Modeling Approach," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 16-wp567, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Carter, Kealy & Jayachandran, Satish & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "Building A Sustainable Shelf: The Role of Firm Sustainability Reputation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 507-522.
    20. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03197914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.