IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02942501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’économie de la défense, un domaine de réflexion négligé par les économistes français

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Fontanel

    (CESICE - Centre d'études sur la sécurité internationale et les coopérations européennes - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble)

Abstract

French economists address the question of defence only in the budgetary area of military spending. Yet national defence and security are necessary for the economy as a whole, even if, in peacetime, spending is often described as unproductive. The question is then raised of the "burden of defence", as if it did not provide the security necessary for all economic activity. Defence economics has not yet found its place as a fundamental discipline of economic science.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Fontanel, 1991. "L’économie de la défense, un domaine de réflexion négligé par les économistes français," Post-Print hal-02942501, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02942501
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-02942501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-02942501/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacques Fontanel, 1989. "Les Comparaisons des dépenses militaires," Post-Print hal-02508752, HAL.
    2. Deger, Saadet & Sen, Somnath, 1990. "Military Expenditure: The Political Economy of International Security," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198291411.
    3. Smith, R P, 1989. "Models of Military Expenditure," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 345-359, Oct.-Dec..
    4. Jacques Fontanel & Ron Smith, 1990. "The impact of strategy and measurement on models of French military expenditure," Post-Print hal-02065551, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Fontanel, 1993. "Le désarmement dans l'histoire des faits et des pensées économiques," Post-Print hal-03183984, HAL.
    2. Yasmine M. Abdelfattah & Aamer S. Abu-Qarn & J. Paul Dunne & Shadwa Zaher, 2014. "The Demand for Military Spending in Egypt," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 231-245, June.
    3. Julien Malizard, 2014. "Dépenses militaires et croissance économique dans un contexte non linéaire. Le cas français," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 65(3), pages 601-618.
    4. Jacques Fontanel, 1993. "L'impact économique d'un désarmement pour le développement," Post-Print hal-03184224, HAL.
    5. Nathan Canen & Kristopher Ramsay, 2023. "Quantifying Theory in Politics: Identification, Interpretation and the Role of Structural Methods," Papers 2302.01897, arXiv.org.
    6. Nasir M. Khilji & Akhtar Mahmood, 1997. "Military Expenditures and Economic Growth in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 791-808.
    7. Giorgio d’Agostino & John Paul Dunne & Luca Pieroni, 2019. "Military Expenditure, Endogeneity and Economic Growth," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 509-524, July.
    8. Ghislain Dutheil de la Rochère & Jean-Michel Josselin & Yvon Rocaboy, 2011. "The role of aggregation technologies in the provision of supranational public goods: A reconsideration of NATO’s strategies," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 85-103, March.
    9. Jurgen Brauer, 2002. "Survey and Review of the Defense Economics Literature on Greece and Turkey: What Have We Learned?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 85-107.
    10. Todd Sandler, 1993. "The Economic Theory of Alliances," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(3), pages 446-483, September.
    11. Young‐Wan Goo & Seung‐Nyeon Kim, 2012. "Time-Varying Characteristics Of South Korea-United States And Japan-United States Military Alliances Under Chinese Threat: A Public Good Approach," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 95-106, February.
    12. Mohamed Douch & Binyam Solomon, 2016. "A dynamic panel analysis using SIPRI’s extended military expenditure data: The case of Middle Power nations," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 45-49, October.
    13. Ismael Sanz & Francisco Javier Velázquez, 2002. "Determinants of the Composition of Government Expenditure by Functions," European Economy Group Working Papers 13, European Economy Group.
    14. Christos Kollias & Suzanna-Maria Paleologou & Andreas Stergiou, 2016. "Military expenditure in Greece: Security challenges and economic constraints," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 28-34, April.
    15. Neha Khanna & Duane Chapman, 2010. "Guns And Oil: An Analysis Of Conventional Weapons Trade In The Post‐Cold War Era," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(2), pages 434-459, April.
    16. Jacques Fontanel, 1993. "Méthodes, hypothèses et concepts relatifs à l'économie du désarmement," Post-Print hal-03183808, HAL.
    17. Kazunori Tanigaki, 2006. "Defense Sector, Armaments-Labor Ratio And National Security," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 59-71.
    18. George, Justin & Sandler, Todd, 2018. "Demand for military spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A spatial panel approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 222-236.
    19. Jacques Fontanel, 1993. "Hypotheses and methodology for the economic analysis of Disarmament," Working Papers hal-02377396, HAL.
    20. Waszkiewicz Grzegorz, 2016. "Drivers of Greek and Turkish Defense Spending," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 51(1), pages 33-46, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02942501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.