IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01796400.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cultural entrepreneurship : generic tensions amplified by the small size of organisations
[L'entrepreneuriat culturel : des tensions génériques qu'amplifie la petite taille des organisations]

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Henry

    (Scènes et savoirs - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

In what way is the theme of cultural entrepreneurship something else than a simple societal or institutional injunction, particularly in France for micro-organisations with professional aim and other than profit-making goals in the field of culture ? While contextual developments, since the end of the last century, largely explain why this theme is currently so pregnant, it also gains to be looked at through the generic tensions of the cultural economy along with those that can be found in very small enterprises. An approach which gives its rightful place to the qualitative and collective dimensions of cultural entrepreneurship therefore seems more relevant than going no further than a conception which would be either far too economical or focused on the figure of the individual entrepreneur. The importance of non-profit-making goals is also to be underlined, even if the issue of a minimal economic viability for each project or organisation remains central. Those different elements are even more intense in very small enterprises. Attempts at cooperative arrangement between cultural micro-enterprises thus show the full interest, but also the structural difficulties, of such approaches, if only to ensure a minimal economic viability for projects whose stakes are not only economic.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Henry, 2018. "Cultural entrepreneurship : generic tensions amplified by the small size of organisations [L'entrepreneuriat culturel : des tensions génériques qu'amplifie la petite taille des organisations]," Post-Print hal-01796400, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01796400
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01796400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01796400/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Fayolle & A. Tounes, 2006. "L'odyssée d'un concept et les multiples figures de l'entrepreneur," Post-Print halshs-00133068, HAL.
    2. Xavier Greffe & Véronique Simonnet, 2010. "Les entreprises culturelles sont-elles soutenables ?," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 120(1), pages 57-86.
    3. Xavier Greffe & Véronique Simonnet, 2010. "Les entreprises culturelles sont-elles soutenables ?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00668935, HAL.
    4. Blanche Segrestin & Kevin Levillain & Vernac Stéphane & Armand Hatchuel, 2015. "La "Société à Objet Social Etendu" : un nouveau statut pour l'entreprise," Post-Print hal-01110767, HAL.
    5. Bo Carlsson & Pontus Braunerhjelm & Maureen McKelvey & Christer Olofsson & Lars Persson & Håkan Ylinenpää, 2013. "The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 913-930, December.
    6. Xavier Greffe & Véronique Simonnet, 2010. "Les entreprises culturelles sont-elles soutenables ?," Post-Print hal-00668935, HAL.
    7. Thom, Marco, 2016. "Crucial skills for the entrepreneurial success of fine artists," Working Papers 01/16, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Coriat, Benjamin, 2013. "Le retour des communs," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    9. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait & Alain Desreumaux, 2009. "Les figures de l'entrepreneur dans une théorie de l'action fondée sur le projet," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 8(1), pages 37-53.
    10. Karen Verduyn & Pascal Dey & Deirdre Tedmanson, 2017. "A critical understanding of entrepreneurship," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 16(1), pages 37-45.
    11. J.P. Bréchet & N. Schieb-Bienfait & A. Desreumaux, 2009. "Les figures de l'entrepreneur dans une théorie de l'action fondée sur le projet," Post-Print hal-00802675, HAL.
    12. Jasmine Tata & Sameer Prasad, 2010. "National cultural values, social capital and micro-enterprise success," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 95-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma del Pilar Muñoz Dueñas & Antonio Vaamonde Liste & Maria do Rosário Cabrita, 2020. "The Survival of Cultural Firms: A Study of Multiple Accounting Parameters in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Sandrine Emin & Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait, 2010. "Explorer le champ des possibles : une posture méthodologique pour accompagner le travail entrepreneurial," Post-Print hal-01524297, HAL.
    3. Anne-Claire Savy, 2019. "Démarche de recherche-accompagnement pour l'action collective de transition," Post-Print hal-02556208, HAL.
    4. Jérémie Forney & Angga Dwiartama, 2023. "The project, the everyday, and reflexivity in sociotechnical agri-food assemblages: proposing a conceptual model of digitalisation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 441-454, June.
    5. Sandrine Berger-Douce & Christophe Lafaye, 2012. "Démarche de projet collaboratif et émergence d'une intelligence collective entrepreneuriale : une étude au sein d'un club de dirigeants de TPE," Post-Print emse-00746666, HAL.
    6. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    7. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    8. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    9. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    10. Magnus Hoppe, 2016. "Policy and entrepreneurship education," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 13-29, January.
    11. AFAWUBO, Komivi & NOGLO, Yawo Agbényégan, 2022. "ICT and entrepreneurship: A comparative analysis of developing, emerging and developed countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Allaire, Gilles, 2013. "Les communs comme infrastructure institutionnelle de l’économie marchande," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    13. David Vallat, 2016. "An Alternative to State-Market Dualism: The Sharing Economy. Practical and Epistemological Questions," Post-Print halshs-01331107, HAL.
    14. João J. M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 181-205, February.
    15. Laura Aufrère & Philippe Eynaud & Olivier Gauthier & Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, 2018. "De l’entreprendre à l’ « encommuns ». Comment un processus entrepreneurial peut-il s’inscrire dans une perspective de création de communs ?," CEPN Working Papers hal-03407872, HAL.
    16. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    17. Laurence Méhaignerie & Blanche Segrestin, 2016. "Soutenir l'émergence des entreprises à impact social : la proposition de la Société à Objet Social Etendu," Post-Print hal-01323210, HAL.
    18. Alexander Chepurenko, 2015. "Entrepreneurship Theory: New Challenges and Future Prospects," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 9(2 (eng)), pages 44-57.
    19. Filippi, Maryline, 2021. "Do French agrifood co-ops have a head start in Corporate Social Responsibility? An initial examination of French co-ops and their practices," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(4), January.
    20. Claudine Gay & Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2019. "Internet innovation contests: a relevant policy tool for responsible research and innovation? [Les concours d’innovation en ligne : un instrument pertinent pour la recherche et l’innovation respons," Post-Print hal-02071112, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cultural entrepreneurship; Socioeconomics; Arts; Coopération; Entrepreneuriat culturel; Socio-économie;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01796400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.