IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00677605.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'équivalence fiscale des revenus et la réforme de l'impôt sur le revenu

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Marie Monnier

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Les débats sur le quotient familial qui constitue le dispositif central dans le calcul de l'IRPP en France, sont principalement centrés sur son impact redistributif. Deux conceptions de l'équité se sont ainsi affrontées. L'une tient compte des configurations familiales ex ante pour corriger le revenu soumis au barème tandis que l'autre corrige ex post l'impôt brut. Après un examen critique des des arguments portés par les deux traditions, l'article définit la notion d'équivalence fiscale des revenus. Il montre que si le dispositif du quotient familial permet la mise en équivalence fiscale des revenus des familles, les corrections dont il fait l'objet la déforme. Il réinterprète la progressivité de l'impôt mise en pratique dans le cadre de l'IRPP et propose enfin une réforme de l'IRPP cohérente avec le paritarisme à la française.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Marie Monnier, 2000. "L'équivalence fiscale des revenus et la réforme de l'impôt sur le revenu," Post-Print hal-00677605, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00677605
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00677605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00677605/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Glaude, 1991. "L'originalité du système du quotient familial," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 248(1), pages 51-67.
    2. Slemrod,Joel, 1997. "Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521587761.
    3. Jean-Marie Monnier, 1998. "Les prélèvements obligatoires," Post-Print halshs-00277227, HAL.
    4. repec:adr:anecst:y:1988:i:11:p:06 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bruno Théret & Didier Uri, 1988. "La courbe de Laffer dix ans après : un essai de bilan critique," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(4), pages 753-808.
    6. Jean-Marie Monnier, 1998. "Les prélèvements obligatoires," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00277227, HAL.
    7. Anthony B. Atkinson & François Bourguignon & Pierre-André Chiappori, 1988. "Fiscalité et transferts: une comparaison franco-britannique," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 11, pages 117-140.
    8. Atkinson, A. B. & Bouguignon, F. & Chiappori, P. A., 1988. "What do we learn about tax reform from international comparisons? France and Britain," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2-3), pages 343-352, March.
    9. Gérard Calot, 1980. "Réflexions sur la prise en compte du nombre des enfants dans la législation familiale et fiscale," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 31(6), pages 1211-1259.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Marie Monnier, 2000. "Harmonisation des fiscalités et structures fiscales européennes entre 1988 et 1996," Post-Print hal-00677603, HAL.
    2. Jean-Marie Monnier, 2000. "L'équivalence fiscale des revenus et la réforme de l'impôt sur le revenu," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00677605, HAL.
    3. Kalina Koleva, 2005. "Seeking for an optimal tax administration: the efficiency costs’ approach [A la recherche de l'administration fiscale optimale : l'approche par les coûts d'efficience]," Post-Print halshs-00195354, HAL.
    4. Kalina Koleva, 2005. "A la recherche de l'administration fiscale optimale : l'approche par les coûts d'efficience," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r05050, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    5. Jean-Marie Monnier, 2000. "Harmonisation des fiscalités et structures fiscales européennes entre 1988 et 1996," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00677603, HAL.
    6. James M. Poterba & Arturo Ramirez Verdugo, 2008. "Portfolio Substitution and the Revenue Cost of Exempting State and Local Government Interest Payments from Federal Income Tax," NBER Working Papers 14439, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Slemrod, Joel, 1998. "Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Taxable Income Elasticities," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 51(n. 4), pages 773-88, December.
    8. Bargain, Olivier & Orsini, Kristian, 2006. "In-work policies in Europe: Killing two birds with one stone?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 667-697, December.
    9. Burkhauser, Richard V. & Larrimore, Jeff & Simon, Kosali I., 2012. "A "Second Opinion" on the Economic Health of the American Middle Class," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(1), pages 7-32, March.
    10. Burman, Leonard E. & Gale, William G. & Weiner, David, 1998. "Six Tax Laws Later: How Individuals' Marginal Federal Income Tax Rates Changed Between 1980 and 1995," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 51(n. 3), pages 637-52, September.
    11. Theo Eicher & Stephen Turnovsky & Maria Carme Riera i Prunera, 2003. "Effects of differential taxation on factor accumulation and growth," Working Papers in Economics 98, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    12. Eugenio Zucchelli & Andrew M Jones & Nigel Rice, 2012. "The evaluation of health policies through dynamic microsimulation methods," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 5(1), pages 2-20.
    13. James P. Ziliak, 2015. "Recent developments in antipoverty policies in the United States," Chapters, in: John Karl Scholz & Hyungypo Moon & Sang-Hyup Lee (ed.), Social Policies in an Age of Austerity, chapter 9, pages 235-262, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. John Bishop & K. Chow & John Formby & Chih-Chin Ho, 1997. "Did Tax Reform Reduce Actual US Progressivity? Evidence from the Taxpayer Compliance Measurement Program," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 4(2), pages 177-197, May.
    15. Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2009. "Welfare Effects of Regressive Taxation and Subsidies in China," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10809, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    16. Burman, Leonard E. & Gale, William G. & Weiner, David, 1998. "Six Tax Laws Later: How Individuals' Marginal Federal Income Tax Rates Changed Between 1980 and 1995," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 51(3), pages 637-652, September.
    17. Norman Schuerhoff, 2004. "Capital Gains Taxes, Irreversible Investment, and Capital Structure," 2004 Meeting Papers 688, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    18. Jeffrey Thompson, 2012. "Raising Revenue from High-Income Households: Should States Continue to Place the Lowest Tax Rates on Those with the Highest Incomes?," Published Studies revenue_peri_march5, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    19. Alan, Sule & Atalay, Kadir & Crossley, Thomas F. & Jeon, Sung-Hee, 2010. "New evidence on taxes and portfolio choice," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 813-823, December.
    20. Peter Lindert, 2003. "Why The Welfare State Looks Like a Free Lunch," Working Papers 59, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00677605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.