Which Improves Welfare More: Nominal or Indexed Bond?
Abstract
Despite economists'' long standing arguments in favor of systematic indexation of loan contracts to remove the risks associated with fluctuations in the purchasing power of money (Jevons (1875), Marshall (1887, 1923), F~lsher (1922), Friedman (1991)), surprisingly few loan contracts are indexed in most Western Eclonomies. fin the United States even thirty year corporate and government bonds are not indexed. The situation is however different in many Latin American countries where indexing is widely used as a way of coping with high and variable inflation rates. What seems difiicult to eicplain is that it takes lvgh variability in inflation rates before private sector agents shift from lmindexed to indexed contracts. In practice, indexing a loan contract m.eans linking its payoff to the value of an officially computed price index such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Such an index is always an imperfect measure of the purchasing power of money: in particular, it fluctuates not only with variations in the general level of prices but also varies with changes in the relative prices of goods. This paper formalizes the idea that the imperfections of indexing may serve tal explain why agents prefer nominal bonds in economies with a low variability in purchasing power of money and only resort to indexing when the variability becomes sufficiently high. The model is a variant of the two-period general equilibrium model with incomplete markets (GEI) in which the purchasing power of money depends on a (broadly defined) measure of the amount of money available in the economy and on an index of real output. The objective of the analysis is to compare two second-best situations, in which in addition to a given security structure, there is either a nominal bond which has the risks induced by fluctuations in the purchasing power of money or an indexed bond which has the risks induced by relative price fluctuations. Adding a bond to an existing market structure has two effects: the(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by California Davis - Department of Economics in its series Department of Economics with number 95-20.Length: 43 pages
Date of creation: 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:95-20
Contact details of provider:
Postal: University of California Davis - Department of Economics. One Shields Ave., California 95616-8578
Phone: (530) 752-0741
Fax: (530) 752-9382
Email:
Web page: http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords: BONDS ; FINANCIAL MARKET ; SOCIAL WELFARE ; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM;Other versions of this item:
- Michael Magill & Martine Quinzii, 1995. "Which Improves Welfare More: Nominal or Indexed Bond?," Discussion Paper Serie A 511, University of Bonn, Germany.
- Magill, M. & Quinzii, M., 1995. "Which Improves Welfare More: Nominal or Indexed Bond?," Papers 95-20, California Davis - Institute of Governmental Affairs.
- MAGILL, Michael & QUINZII, Martine, 1995. "Which Improves Welfare More : Nominal or Indexed Bond ?," CORE Discussion Papers 1995072, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Magill, M. & Quinzii, M., 1995. "Which Improves Welfare More: Nominal or Indexed Bond?," Papers 9521, Southern California - Department of Economics.
- Martine Quinzii & Michael Magill, 2004. "Which Improves Welfare More: Nominal Or Indexed Bond?," Working Papers 9520, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
- G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
- G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing
- H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- Ceyhun Bora Durdu, 2007.
"Quantitative Implications of Indexed Bonds in Small Open Economies,"
2007 Meeting Papers
482, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Durdu, Ceyhun Bora, 2009. "Quantitative implications of indexed bonds in small open economies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 883-902, April.
- Ceyhun Bora Durdu, 2007. "Quantitative implications of indexed bonds in small open economies," International Finance Discussion Papers 909, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:95-20For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

