This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Healthcare Expenditures of Living with a Disability: Total Expenditures, Out of Pocket Expenses and Burden, 1996-2004

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sophie Mitra (Fordham University, Department of Economics)
Patricia A. Findley (Rutgers University, School of Social Work)
Usha Sambamoorthi (UMASS Medical School, Worcester, Department of Psychiatry, and Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Objective--This paper estimates the healthcare expenditures associated with a disability at the individual level and their recent trends. Design--Retrospective analysis of survey data. Participants--Data from multiple years (1996 through 2004) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) for a nationally representative sample of civilian, non-institutionalized US population. Interventions--Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures--Healthcare expenditures consisted of: total healthcare expenditures, total out-of-pocket spending (OOP), and burden (the ratio of OOP to individual income). All the analyses accounted for the complex survey design of the MEPS. Results--Between 1996 and 2004, 6% to 9% of individuals in the working age group (21-61 years) were identified as having a disability. Persons with disabilities consistently had higher total health expenditures, OOP and burden compared to their counterparts without disabilities. In 2004, the average total expenditures were estimated at $10,508 for persons with disabilities and at $2,256 for those without disabilities. In a multiple regression framework, persons with disabilities were consistently found to have higher expenditures and OOP between 1996 and 2004. Although expenditures, OOP and burden increased over time, after controlling for demographic, socio-economic, and health status, these three healthcare costs were not found to increase disproportionately for individuals with disability. Conclusions--Over the 1996-2004 period, persons with disabilities are consistently found to have significantly higher health expenditures and OOP compared to their counterparts without disabilities, which may adversely affect their health and standard of living.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.fordham.edu/images/academics/graduate_schools/gsas/economics/dp2008_18_mitra_findley_sambamoorthi.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Fordham University, Department of Economics in its series Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series with number dp2008-18.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:frd:wpaper:dp2008-18

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.fordham.edu/economics/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Fordham Economics).

Related research
Keywords: Disability; Health Expenditures; Out of Pocket Expenditures; Burden;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Andrew Jones & Owen O'Donnell, . "Equivalence Scales and the Costs of Disability," Discussion Papers 94/12, Department of Economics, University of York.
    Other versions:
  2. Asghar Zaidi & Tania Burchardt, 2005. "Comparing Incomes When Needs Differ: Equivalization For The Extra Costs Of Disability In The U.K," Review of Income and Wealth, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 51(1), pages 89-114, 03. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Lukas Steinmann & Harry Telser & Peter Zweifel, 2007. "Aging and Future Healthcare Expenditure: A Consistent Approach," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1041-1041. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.