Sector-specific human capital and the distribution of earnings
AbstractThis paper incorporates assignment frictions and sector-specific training into the Roy model of occupational choice. Assignment frictions represent the extent of the market whereas differences in sector-specific training reflect worker specialization. This framework thus captures Adam Smith's idea that the extent of the market determines the division of labor. The paper demonstrates the way in which the relationship between assignment frictions and specialization affects the level and composition of human capital acquisition, aggregate output, and the distribution of income. Not surprisingly, economy-wide training, output, and specialization increase as the extent of the market increases. The distribution of these gains, however, is uneven. Within group or residual income, distribution does not converge monotonically as search frictions diminish. Comparisons across groups reveal that these effects can become more pronounced as average income increases.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta in its series Working Paper with number 2009-21.
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Eric Smith, 2010. "Sector-Specific Human Capital and the Distribution of Earnings," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 35-61.
- NEP-ALL-2009-10-31 (All new papers)
- NEP-HRM-2009-10-31 (Human Capital & Human Resource Management)
- NEP-LAB-2009-10-31 (Labour Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Van Reenen, John, 1996.
"The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and Innovation in a Panel of U.K. Companies,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
MIT Press, vol. 111(1), pages 195-226, February.
- Van Reenen, John, 1994. "The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and Innovation in a Panel of UK Companies," CEPR Discussion Papers 1071, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Katz, Lawrence F. & Autor, David H., 1999. "Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 26, pages 1463-1555 Elsevier.
- Gueorgui Kambourov & Iourii Manovskii, 2009.
"Occupational Mobility and Wage Inequality,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Oxford University Press, vol. 76(2), pages 731-759.
- Heckman, James J & Sedlacek, Guilherme, 1985. "Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and Market Wage Functions: An Empirical Model of Self-selection in the Labor Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(6), pages 1077-1125, December.
- repec:ebl:ecbull:v:10:y:2008:i:11:p:1-12 is not listed on IDEAS
- Huw Lloyd-Ellis, 1999. "Endogenous Technological Change and Wage Inequality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(1), pages 47-77, March.
- Konstantinos Eleftheriou, 2008. "Matching, Specialties and Wage Inequality," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12.
- Claudia Goldin & Lawrence F. Katz, 1999. "The Returns to Skill in the United States across the Twentieth Century," NBER Working Papers 7126, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Meredith Rector).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.